Next-Day Discharge Is Feasible in Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Anatomical Lung Resections Irrespective of Patient Characteristics

<b>Background:</b> Next-day discharge post-robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) anatomical lung resections are shown to be achieved in young and fit patients. This study aims to compare next-day discharge RATS anatomical lung resection patients matched with patients who stayed longer. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RATS anatomical lung resection by a single surgeon was conducted. Based on the variables found to be different, two propensity-matched groups were created: a next-day discharge group and a group of patients with longer stays. <b>Results:</b> This study included 202 patients, 49 (24.3%) of whom were discharged the next day. The mean age was 68.3 ± 9.8 years, and 114 (56.4%) patients were females. Based on the variables found different, two matched groups with 46 patients for age, gender, performance score, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, number of co-morbidities and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 sec were created. Re-admissions, complications, and death rates were similar, but next-day discharge patients had more sublobar resections (65.2% vs. 37%, <i>p</i> = 0.029), shorter procedures (132 vs. 179 min, <i>p</i> = 0.048), and morning theater slots (71.7% vs. 32.6, <i>p</i> = 0.018). These were shown to be independent predictors of next-day discharge. Major air leak issues also kept patients in the hospital longer (23.9% vs. 6.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.024). <b>Conclusions:</b> Next-day discharge following RATS anatomical lung resection appeared to have no increased risk of re-admissions or complications, irrespective of fitness, age, or other patient characteristics. Patients receiving short-duration surgery and morning sublobar resections without major air leak issues have higher chances of achieving next-day discharge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093198
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Next-Day Discharge Is Feasible in Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Anatomical Lung Resections Irrespective of Patient Characteristics

Obada Alqudah, Vasileios Kouritas, Bartłomiej Szafron, William Ansley et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Next-Day Discharge Is Feasible in Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Anatomical Lung Resections Irrespective of Patient Characteristics

Obada Alqudah, Vasileios Kouritas, Bartłomiej Szafron, William Ansley, Ahmad Asqalan, Hammad Hassan, Jakub Kadlec, Ra’fat Tawalbeh, Waldemar Bartosik, Cristina Viola
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Next-day discharge post-robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) anatomical lung resections are shown to be achieved in young and fit patients. This study aims to compare next-day discharge RATS anatomical lung resection patients matched with patients who stayed longer. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RATS anatomical lung resection by a single surgeon was conducted. Based on the variables found to be different, two propensity-matched groups were created: a next-day discharge group and a group of patients with longer stays. <b>Results:</b> This study included 202 patients, 49 (24.3%) of whom were discharged the next day. The mean age was 68.3 ± 9.8 years, and 114 (56.4%) patients were females. Based on the variables found different, two matched groups with 46 patients for age, gender, performance score, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, number of co-morbidities and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 sec were created. Re-admissions, complications, and death rates were similar, but next-day discharge patients had more sublobar resections (65.2% vs. 37%, <i>p</i> = 0.029), shorter procedures (132 vs. 179 min, <i>p</i> = 0.048), and morning theater slots (71.7% vs. 32.6, <i>p</i> = 0.018). These were shown to be independent predictors of next-day discharge. Major air leak issues also kept patients in the hospital longer (23.9% vs. 6.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.024). <b>Conclusions:</b> Next-day discharge following RATS anatomical lung resection appeared to have no increased risk of re-admissions or complications, irrespective of fitness, age, or other patient characteristics. Patients receiving short-duration surgery and morning sublobar resections without major air leak issues have higher chances of achieving next-day discharge.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(9)
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.