How Much Should Consumers with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss Spend on Hearing Devices?

<b>Background:</b> This study examined the relationship between hearing device price and sound quality. <b>Method:</b> A novel consumer-centric metric of sound quality ("SoundScore") was used to assess hearing devices' audio performance. Each hearing device is tested with two fittings. The "Initial Fit" is designed to approximate the most likely fitting for an individual with a mild-to-moderate sloping sensorineural hearing loss. The "Tuned Fit" includes adjusting parameters optimized to hit prescriptive fitting targets (NAL NL2) on an acoustic manikin. Each fitting is evaluated across five dimensions. Both fittings are combined using a weighted average to create a single number from 0 to 5 representative of a device's overall audio performance. Seventy-one hearing devices were tested. <b>Results:</b> A strong positive correlation was found between hearing device price and SoundScore. The average SoundScore increased dramatically as the price approached USD 1000, with marginal improvements beyond this point. SoundScore was consistently poor for devices under USD 500, highly variable between USD 500-1000, and consistently good over USD 1000. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is a strong but nonlinear relationship between hearing device price and sound quality. This information can aid consumers in making informed decisions while also assisting hearing healthcare professionals in providing comprehensive guidance to their patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15030051
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Much Should Consumers with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss Spend on Hearing Devices?

Andrew T. Sabin, De Wet Swanepoel, Hansapani Rodrigo, Abram Bailey et al.
1 citations
Audiology Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
article

How Much Should Consumers with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss Spend on Hearing Devices?

Andrew T. Sabin, De Wet Swanepoel, Hansapani Rodrigo, Abram Bailey, Vinaya K C Manchaiah, Steve Taddei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> This study examined the relationship between hearing device price and sound quality. <b>Method:</b> A novel consumer-centric metric of sound quality ("SoundScore") was used to assess hearing devices' audio performance. Each hearing device is tested with two fittings. The "Initial Fit" is designed to approximate the most likely fitting for an individual with a mild-to-moderate sloping sensorineural hearing loss. The "Tuned Fit" includes adjusting parameters optimized to hit prescriptive fitting targets (NAL NL2) on an acoustic manikin. Each fitting is evaluated across five dimensions. Both fittings are combined using a weighted average to create a single number from 0 to 5 representative of a device's overall audio performance. Seventy-one hearing devices were tested. <b>Results:</b> A strong positive correlation was found between hearing device price and SoundScore. The average SoundScore increased dramatically as the price approached USD 1000, with marginal improvements beyond this point. SoundScore was consistently poor for devices under USD 500, highly variable between USD 500-1000, and consistently good over USD 1000. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is a strong but nonlinear relationship between hearing device price and sound quality. This information can aid consumers in making informed decisions while also assisting hearing healthcare professionals in providing comprehensive guidance to their patients.

Audiology ResearchVol. 15(3)
University of Colorado Hospital (US), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US), University of Colorado Health (US), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.