Do Australian sexual health clinics have the capacity to meet demand? A mixed methods survey of directors of sexual health clinics in Australia

Background The study describes the capacity of publicly funded sexual health clinics in Australia and explores the challenges they face. Methods We sent a survey to the directors of publicly funded sexual health clinics across Australia between January and March 2024. The survey asked about how their clinics were managing the current clinical demand. Results Twenty-seven of 35 directors of sexual health clinics responded. These 27 clinics offered a median of 35 (IQR: 20-60) bookings each day, but only a median of 10 (IQR: 2-15) walk-in consultations for symptomatic patients. The average proportion of days that clinics were able to see all patients who presented with symptoms was 70.1% (95% CI 55.4, 84.9) during summer versus 75.4% (95% CI 62.2, 88.5) during winter. For patients without symptoms, the corresponding proportions were 53.3% (95% CI 37.9, 68.8) during summer versus 57.7% (95% CI 41.7, 73.7) during winter. If these percentages were adjusted for the number of consultations that the clinic provided, then the corresponding numbers for symptomatic individuals was 51.0% for summer and 65.2% for winter, and for asymptomatic individuals it was 48.1% and 49.8%, respectively. The catchment population of the clinics for each consultation they provided ranged from as low as 3696 to a maximum of 5 million (median 521,077). Conclusions The high proportion of days on which sexual health clinics were not able to see all patients is likely to delay testing and treatment of individuals at high risk of STIs and impede effective STI control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual Health
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/sh25026
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Australian sexual health clinics have the capacity to meet demand? A mixed methods survey of directors of sexual health clinics in Australia

Tiffany Renee Phillips, Eric P. F. Chow, John Cotter, Jason J. Ong et al.
2 citations
Sexual Health
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
5.63
article

Do Australian sexual health clinics have the capacity to meet demand? A mixed methods survey of directors of sexual health clinics in Australia

Tiffany Renee Phillips, Eric P. F. Chow, John Cotter, Jason J. Ong, Christopher Kincaid Fairley, Rick Varma, Louise Owen, Caroline Thng, Nathan Ryder, Sarah Martin, Lei Zhang, Darren Russell
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background The study describes the capacity of publicly funded sexual health clinics in Australia and explores the challenges they face. Methods We sent a survey to the directors of publicly funded sexual health clinics across Australia between January and March 2024. The survey asked about how their clinics were managing the current clinical demand. Results Twenty-seven of 35 directors of sexual health clinics responded. These 27 clinics offered a median of 35 (IQR: 20-60) bookings each day, but only a median of 10 (IQR: 2-15) walk-in consultations for symptomatic patients. The average proportion of days that clinics were able to see all patients who presented with symptoms was 70.1% (95% CI 55.4, 84.9) during summer versus 75.4% (95% CI 62.2, 88.5) during winter. For patients without symptoms, the corresponding proportions were 53.3% (95% CI 37.9, 68.8) during summer versus 57.7% (95% CI 41.7, 73.7) during winter. If these percentages were adjusted for the number of consultations that the clinic provided, then the corresponding numbers for symptomatic individuals was 51.0% for summer and 65.2% for winter, and for asymptomatic individuals it was 48.1% and 49.8%, respectively. The catchment population of the clinics for each consultation they provided ranged from as low as 3696 to a maximum of 5 million (median 521,077). Conclusions The high proportion of days on which sexual health clinics were not able to see all patients is likely to delay testing and treatment of individuals at high risk of STIs and impede effective STI control.

Sexual HealthVol. 22(3)
Australian National University (AU), Australian Taxation Office (AU), New South Wales Department of Health (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Belmont Hospital (AU), Geelong Hospital (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), Fremantle Hospital (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Hospital for Tropical Diseases (GB), Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (AU), Sydney Sexual Health Centre (AU), New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry (AU), Monash Health (AU), Inland Fisheries Service (AU), Gold Coast Health (AU), Hunter New England Local Health District (AU), Hospital for Tropical Diseases (VN), Act Health (AU), Monash University (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.