Shared Misconceptions in Theories of “Chinese Imperialism” and “Brazilian Subimperialism” in Latin America

In the early twenty-first century, China’s economic and political presence in Latin America grew significantly, particularly after its accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), while Brazil took on an active leadership role in promoting regional integration, especially during the Workers’ Party (PT) administrations. This period saw a surge in analyses labeling China’s engagement in Latin America as “imperialist” and Brazil’s as “subimperialist.” By critically examining the key foreign policy instruments employed by both nations in the Latin American context, this article challenges these characterizations, arguing instead that Brazil and China’s actions have strengthened South–South cooperation and provided constructive alternatives for the international integration of the region’s countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Society
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237251334300
Citations
3
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shared Misconceptions in Theories of “Chinese Imperialism” and “Brazilian Subimperialism” in Latin America

Jiang Shixue, Tiago Soares Nogara
3 citations
Science & Society
International Development and Aid
10.35
article

Shared Misconceptions in Theories of “Chinese Imperialism” and “Brazilian Subimperialism” in Latin America

Jiang Shixue, Tiago Soares Nogara
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In the early twenty-first century, China’s economic and political presence in Latin America grew significantly, particularly after its accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), while Brazil took on an active leadership role in promoting regional integration, especially during the Workers’ Party (PT) administrations. This period saw a surge in analyses labeling China’s engagement in Latin America as “imperialist” and Brazil’s as “subimperialist.” By critically examining the key foreign policy instruments employed by both nations in the Latin American context, this article challenges these characterizations, arguing instead that Brazil and China’s actions have strengthened South–South cooperation and provided constructive alternatives for the international integration of the region’s countries.

Science & SocietyVol. 89(3)
Shanghai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
International Development and Aid
10.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Shared Misconceptions in Theories of “Chinese Imperialism” and “Brazilian Subimperialism” in Latin America — Jiang Shixue, Tiago Soares Nogara · Science & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS