Who Struggles with which Demand? Using Level Models to Understand Interindividual Differences in and Relations Between Facets of Fraction Knowledge

Abstract Dealing with fractions is a central and complex topic in mathematics learning. Existing theoretical models of fraction knowledge and skills describe central knowledge facets and roughly characterize procedural demands. However, it is still unclear how to describe students’ levels of fraction knowledge and skills with explicit reference to the mastered contents and how to understand relations between skill facets using these levels. Based on two datasets with 751 sixth and seventh graders, a structural model with three facets is investigated: knowledge of fraction subconstructs, fraction arithmetic skills, and fraction word problem-solving. These facets build on each other in existing models of fraction knowledge and many fraction curricula. Levels for the three constructs are characterized by more or less prestructured fraction demands and the complexity of numerical information. Linear relations between conceptual and procedural fraction demands are investigated in detail concerning the level descriptions, confirming that conceptual demands show a more substantial contribution to procedural demands than vice versa. Further, the results underline the complexity of fraction word problems demands and that mastering them may require at least the lower levels of knowledge of fraction subconstructs and fraction arithmetic skills. The results provide a basis for learning trajectories and different formative activities in school practice, which may also be relevant for mathematics teacher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10569-4
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Struggles with which Demand? Using Level Models to Understand Interindividual Differences in and Relations Between Facets of Fraction Knowledge

Stefan Ufer, Constanze Schadl
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
School Choice and Performance
article

Who Struggles with which Demand? Using Level Models to Understand Interindividual Differences in and Relations Between Facets of Fraction Knowledge

Stefan Ufer, Constanze Schadl
article en

Abstract

Abstract Dealing with fractions is a central and complex topic in mathematics learning. Existing theoretical models of fraction knowledge and skills describe central knowledge facets and roughly characterize procedural demands. However, it is still unclear how to describe students’ levels of fraction knowledge and skills with explicit reference to the mastered contents and how to understand relations between skill facets using these levels. Based on two datasets with 751 sixth and seventh graders, a structural model with three facets is investigated: knowledge of fraction subconstructs, fraction arithmetic skills, and fraction word problem-solving. These facets build on each other in existing models of fraction knowledge and many fraction curricula. Levels for the three constructs are characterized by more or less prestructured fraction demands and the complexity of numerical information. Linear relations between conceptual and procedural fraction demands are investigated in detail concerning the level descriptions, confirming that conceptual demands show a more substantial contribution to procedural demands than vice versa. Further, the results underline the complexity of fraction word problems demands and that mastering them may require at least the lower levels of knowledge of fraction subconstructs and fraction arithmetic skills. The results provide a basis for learning trajectories and different formative activities in school practice, which may also be relevant for mathematics teacher education.

International Journal of Science and Mathematics EducationVol. 23(7)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Munich School of Philosophy (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.