Possibilities of Evaluating the Quality of Products Produced by Directed Energy Deposition Technology

It is well known that the porosity of a product can have a negative effect on the mechanical properties of the product. For this reason, its control is very important. Porosity can be assessed by two methods - destructive and nondestructive inspection. However, the identification of very small pores is still very difficult for metallic materials, as the pore size may be below the resolution of most commonly used NDT techniques. In addition, different types of pores may be present in a single part, with one type usually dominating. Proper identification of porosity is essential to estimate the impact on structural properties. For pore assessment, as for other defects, the description of the morphology, distribution and frequency is important. This article deals with the comparison of methods designed to determine the porosity of products that have been manufactured using Laser Directed Energy Deposition – L-DED additive process. The samples were made from AISI 316L stainless steel. The porosity of these samples was assessed using destructive and nondestructive methods. Subsequently, their comparison was made in relation to the detection of different pore sizes. The samples were subsequently subjected to the HIP process (Hot Isostatic Pressing). For these samples, the changes that occurred in the material as a result of this process were subsequently quantified. This process should have a positive effect on improving the quality of the product produced by AM technologies, e.g. by reducing the number and size of pores.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21062/mft.2025.025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Possibilities of Evaluating the Quality of Products Produced by Directed Energy Deposition Technology

David Bricín, Petr Beneš, Denisa Janová
1 citations
MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
article

Possibilities of Evaluating the Quality of Products Produced by Directed Energy Deposition Technology

David Bricín, Petr Beneš, Denisa Janová
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is well known that the porosity of a product can have a negative effect on the mechanical properties of the product. For this reason, its control is very important. Porosity can be assessed by two methods - destructive and nondestructive inspection. However, the identification of very small pores is still very difficult for metallic materials, as the pore size may be below the resolution of most commonly used NDT techniques. In addition, different types of pores may be present in a single part, with one type usually dominating. Proper identification of porosity is essential to estimate the impact on structural properties. For pore assessment, as for other defects, the description of the morphology, distribution and frequency is important. This article deals with the comparison of methods designed to determine the porosity of products that have been manufactured using Laser Directed Energy Deposition – L-DED additive process. The samples were made from AISI 316L stainless steel. The porosity of these samples was assessed using destructive and nondestructive methods. Subsequently, their comparison was made in relation to the detection of different pore sizes. The samples were subsequently subjected to the HIP process (Hot Isostatic Pressing). For these samples, the changes that occurred in the material as a result of this process were subsequently quantified. This process should have a positive effect on improving the quality of the product produced by AM technologies, e.g. by reducing the number and size of pores.

MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGYVol. 25(2)
Ministerstvo Průmyslu a Obchodu
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Possibilities of Evaluating the Quality of Products Produced by Directed Energy Deposition Technology — David Bricín, Petr Beneš, et al. · MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS