Exploring in-store and e-shopping against disruptive events: A cross-lagged panel SEM

This paper addresses a key gap in the literature by examining the dynamic and bidirectional relationship between in-store and e-shopping frequency during different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies primarily rely on cross-sectional data which fail to capture the temporal evolution and bidirectional nature of these behaviours. To overcome these limitations, this study implements a Random Intercept Cross-lagged Structural Equation Modelling (RI-CLPM) approach using three waves of panel data. Taking Luxembourg as the case study, the paper investigates the modifications in in-store shopping-related travel behaviour by evaluating shifts in trip frequency for three periods: pre-pandemic, post-peak, and relaxed measures phase. The results showed a significant shift in shopping frequency between the pre-pandemic and post-peak phase, evidencing substitution and complementarity effects both on individual as well as group level. Moreover, ANOVA and chi-square tests suggested that age and gender significantly influence in-store shopping frequency for these periods. However, no significant differences in e-shopping and in-store shopping frequencies were observed between the post-peak and the relaxed measures period. These findings provide critical insights for understanding shopping behaviour transitions and offer valuable guidance for transport policymaking. The paper closes by discussing how RI-CLPM models may improve transport policymaking, in the context of future disruptions, considering their potential for: (i) isolating policy impacts amid individual differences, (ii) addressing stable and dynamic shopping behaviours, and (iii) dealing with longitudinal data that allows for adaptive policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104505
Primary Topic
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring in-store and e-shopping against disruptive events: A cross-lagged panel SEM

Susan Grant‐Muller, Véronique Van Acker, Martin Dijst, Raúl F. Elizondo-Candanedo et al.
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
article

Exploring in-store and e-shopping against disruptive events: A cross-lagged panel SEM

Susan Grant‐Muller, Véronique Van Acker, Martin Dijst, Raúl F. Elizondo-Candanedo, Aldo Arranz-López
article en

Abstract

This paper addresses a key gap in the literature by examining the dynamic and bidirectional relationship between in-store and e-shopping frequency during different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies primarily rely on cross-sectional data which fail to capture the temporal evolution and bidirectional nature of these behaviours. To overcome these limitations, this study implements a Random Intercept Cross-lagged Structural Equation Modelling (RI-CLPM) approach using three waves of panel data. Taking Luxembourg as the case study, the paper investigates the modifications in in-store shopping-related travel behaviour by evaluating shifts in trip frequency for three periods: pre-pandemic, post-peak, and relaxed measures phase. The results showed a significant shift in shopping frequency between the pre-pandemic and post-peak phase, evidencing substitution and complementarity effects both on individual as well as group level. Moreover, ANOVA and chi-square tests suggested that age and gender significantly influence in-store shopping frequency for these periods. However, no significant differences in e-shopping and in-store shopping frequencies were observed between the post-peak and the relaxed measures period. These findings provide critical insights for understanding shopping behaviour transitions and offer valuable guidance for transport policymaking. The paper closes by discussing how RI-CLPM models may improve transport policymaking, in the context of future disruptions, considering their potential for: (i) isolating policy impacts amid individual differences, (ii) addressing stable and dynamic shopping behaviours, and (iii) dealing with longitudinal data that allows for adaptive policy design.

Transportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeVol. 197
University of Leeds (GB), University of Luxembourg (LU), Zaragoza Logistics Center (ES), Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LU), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.