Assessing differences in workplace relational compassion between religious and non-religious employees

Purpose The present study examines relational compassion, defined as the perception of compassion exhibited by others towards others in the context of workers' industry type. Relational compassion is an understudied social phenomenon, and little is known about its mechanisms or foundations in organizational contexts. Accordingly, we examine differences in relational compassion between religious and non-religious employees within four major industry groups: Private Sector, Non-Profit, Government and Healthcare. Design/methodology/approach The direct and interaction effects of religiosity and industry type on relational compassion are examined in order to gain insights on how affiliation is associated with relational compassion. To accomplish this, generalized linear models are applied to examine differences between two groups, one identifying as religious, the other identifying as non-religious in order to determine how religiosity and industry are associated with relational compassion scores from respondents from four major industry categories. Findings Significant differences in relational compassion between religious and non-religious groups were found. Specifically, religiously affiliated respondents identifying as private sector and non-profit workers are found to have significantly more relational compassion than non-religiously affiliated employees in the same industry groups. Originality/value These results suggest that religiosity and industry group affiliation interact and can have notable effects on employee relational compassion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Evidence-based HRM a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-01-2025-0002
Primary Topic
Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing differences in workplace relational compassion between religious and non-religious employees

David E. Cavazos, Nathan Heller, Brian Martinson
Evidence-based HRM a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship
Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
article

Assessing differences in workplace relational compassion between religious and non-religious employees

David E. Cavazos, Nathan Heller, Brian Martinson
article en

Abstract

Purpose The present study examines relational compassion, defined as the perception of compassion exhibited by others towards others in the context of workers' industry type. Relational compassion is an understudied social phenomenon, and little is known about its mechanisms or foundations in organizational contexts. Accordingly, we examine differences in relational compassion between religious and non-religious employees within four major industry groups: Private Sector, Non-Profit, Government and Healthcare. Design/methodology/approach The direct and interaction effects of religiosity and industry type on relational compassion are examined in order to gain insights on how affiliation is associated with relational compassion. To accomplish this, generalized linear models are applied to examine differences between two groups, one identifying as religious, the other identifying as non-religious in order to determine how religiosity and industry are associated with relational compassion scores from respondents from four major industry categories. Findings Significant differences in relational compassion between religious and non-religious groups were found. Specifically, religiously affiliated respondents identifying as private sector and non-profit workers are found to have significantly more relational compassion than non-religiously affiliated employees in the same industry groups. Originality/value These results suggest that religiosity and industry group affiliation interact and can have notable effects on employee relational compassion.

Evidence-based HRM a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.