Energy, exergy, and economic evaluations of various cylindrical lithium-ion battery thermal management systems

Liquid-cooled thermal management has recently gained interest for higher battery discharge rates, although the thermo-economic consideration remains largely unexplored. Hence, this study explores 3E (energy, exergy, and economic) analysis for the thermal management of cylindrical lithium-ion battery modules for 5C discharge rate. Three microchannel-cooled battery packs (Aluminum, Phase Change Material (PCM), and foam+PCM) are compared using ternary hybrid (0.4 %Al 2 O 3 , 0.3 %MXene, 0.3 %MWCNT/water) nanofluid . At a low mass flow rate (0.1875 g/s), the foam+PCM pack achieves the lowest maximum temperature T max (312.15 K) and aluminum pack performs better at a higher flow rate (1 g/s). PCM pack exhibits higher T max and temperature gradient . Aluminum block demonstrates superior thermal efficiency (76.03 % at 0.1875 g/s) and exergy efficiency (37.9 % at 0.1875 g/s). Foam+PCM pack, although less efficient than aluminum, provides improved heat distribution and reduced exergy destruction . PCM pack, although affordable at $42.331, fails to maintain safe T max , while aluminum block incurs higher pump running costs. Foam+PCM pack, though initially more expensive, may result in long-term savings through increased effectiveness and lower energy usage. Copper foam-based pack outperforms aluminum and nickel foams, offering the best thermal and exergy efficiencies; hence, optimal heat management , enhanced temperature control, and energy savings make this the most effective choice. • Thermo-economic analysis of cylindrical Li-ion battery thermal management systems. • Three microchannel-cooled battery packs using ternary hybrid nanofluid are compared. • Effects of liquid mass flow rate and foam material are studied for high discharge rate. • Foam+PCM pack, though initially more expensive, may result in long-term savings. • Copper foam-based pack offers best thermal and exergy efficiencies and energy saving.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109007
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy, exergy, and economic evaluations of various cylindrical lithium-ion battery thermal management systems

Jahar Sarkar, Swasti Sundar Mondal, Kartik Kumar
9 citations
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
6.15
article

Energy, exergy, and economic evaluations of various cylindrical lithium-ion battery thermal management systems

Jahar Sarkar, Swasti Sundar Mondal, Kartik Kumar
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Liquid-cooled thermal management has recently gained interest for higher battery discharge rates, although the thermo-economic consideration remains largely unexplored. Hence, this study explores 3E (energy, exergy, and economic) analysis for the thermal management of cylindrical lithium-ion battery modules for 5C discharge rate. Three microchannel-cooled battery packs (Aluminum, Phase Change Material (PCM), and foam+PCM) are compared using ternary hybrid (0.4 %Al 2 O 3 , 0.3 %MXene, 0.3 %MWCNT/water) nanofluid . At a low mass flow rate (0.1875 g/s), the foam+PCM pack achieves the lowest maximum temperature T max (312.15 K) and aluminum pack performs better at a higher flow rate (1 g/s). PCM pack exhibits higher T max and temperature gradient . Aluminum block demonstrates superior thermal efficiency (76.03 % at 0.1875 g/s) and exergy efficiency (37.9 % at 0.1875 g/s). Foam+PCM pack, although less efficient than aluminum, provides improved heat distribution and reduced exergy destruction . PCM pack, although affordable at $42.331, fails to maintain safe T max , while aluminum block incurs higher pump running costs. Foam+PCM pack, though initially more expensive, may result in long-term savings through increased effectiveness and lower energy usage. Copper foam-based pack outperforms aluminum and nickel foams, offering the best thermal and exergy efficiencies; hence, optimal heat management , enhanced temperature control, and energy savings make this the most effective choice. • Thermo-economic analysis of cylindrical Li-ion battery thermal management systems. • Three microchannel-cooled battery packs using ternary hybrid nanofluid are compared. • Effects of liquid mass flow rate and foam material are studied for high discharge rate. • Foam+PCM pack, though initially more expensive, may result in long-term savings. • Copper foam-based pack offers best thermal and exergy efficiencies and energy saving.

International Communications in Heat and Mass TransferVol. 165
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
6.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy, exergy, and economic evaluations of various cylindrical lithium-ion battery thermal management systems — Jahar Sarkar, Swasti Sundar Mondal, et al. · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS