Reproductive Technology in Dystopian Times

Although reproductive technologies are often sold as ways for individuals to take control of their future and guard against precarity, the proliferation of the idea of the “tech fix” can strengthen systems that are making our communities less secure in the first place. This essay thus explores the tension between technologies offered to us as individuals to address our problems and the negative consequences of leaning too heavily on technologies to address or mitigate what are, essentially, structural problems. I argue that the way that emerging reproductive technologies are being developed and sold threatens to intensify individualism, break solidarity, and increase the wealth and power of investors. In doing so, this essay reviews existing literature on reproductive technology, focusing on scholarship that offers critical insights for understanding the myriad technological and political changes in human reproduction on the horizon. The essay covers topics including financialization, stratified reproduction, the transnational reproductive bioeconomy, surveillance, and eugenics to highlight how scholarship has uncovered many problems with the idea of the “tech fix” in the realm of reproduction. The essay also calls for more critical examinations of the politics of reproductive technologies and greater integration of disability justice into reproductive technology scholarship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sex & Sexualities
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/3033371251329579
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive Technology in Dystopian Times

Jennifer Denbow
1 citations
Sex & Sexualities
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
article

Reproductive Technology in Dystopian Times

Jennifer Denbow
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although reproductive technologies are often sold as ways for individuals to take control of their future and guard against precarity, the proliferation of the idea of the “tech fix” can strengthen systems that are making our communities less secure in the first place. This essay thus explores the tension between technologies offered to us as individuals to address our problems and the negative consequences of leaning too heavily on technologies to address or mitigate what are, essentially, structural problems. I argue that the way that emerging reproductive technologies are being developed and sold threatens to intensify individualism, break solidarity, and increase the wealth and power of investors. In doing so, this essay reviews existing literature on reproductive technology, focusing on scholarship that offers critical insights for understanding the myriad technological and political changes in human reproduction on the horizon. The essay covers topics including financialization, stratified reproduction, the transnational reproductive bioeconomy, surveillance, and eugenics to highlight how scholarship has uncovered many problems with the idea of the “tech fix” in the realm of reproduction. The essay also calls for more critical examinations of the politics of reproductive technologies and greater integration of disability justice into reproductive technology scholarship.

Sex & SexualitiesVol. 1(1)
California Polytechnic State University (US), Cal Poly Corporation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.