Double robust variance estimation with parametric working models

Doubly robust estimators have gained popularity in the field of causal inference due to their ability to provide consistent point estimates when either an outcome or an exposure model is correctly specified. However, for nonrandomized exposures, the influence function based variance estimator frequently used with doubly robust estimators of the average causal effect is only consistent when both working models (ie, outcome and exposure models) are correctly specified. Here, the empirical sandwich variance estimator and the nonparametric bootstrap are demonstrated to be doubly robust variance estimators. That is, they are expected to provide valid estimates of the variance leading to nominal confidence interval coverage when only 1 working model is correctly specified. Simulation studies illustrate the properties of the influence function based, empirical sandwich, and nonparametric bootstrap variance estimators in the setting where parametric working models are assumed. Estimators are applied to data from the Improving Pregnancy Outcomes with Progesterone (IPOP) study to estimate the effect of maternal anemia on birth weight among women with HIV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biometrics
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujaf054
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double robust variance estimation with parametric working models

Bonnie E. Shook‐Sa, Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, Chanhwa Lee, Rachael K. Ross et al.
4 citations
Biometrics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
10.52
article

Double robust variance estimation with parametric working models

Bonnie E. Shook‐Sa, Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, Chanhwa Lee, Rachael K. Ross, Jessie K. Edwards, Paul N. Zivich, Keyi Xue, Stephen R. Cole
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Doubly robust estimators have gained popularity in the field of causal inference due to their ability to provide consistent point estimates when either an outcome or an exposure model is correctly specified. However, for nonrandomized exposures, the influence function based variance estimator frequently used with doubly robust estimators of the average causal effect is only consistent when both working models (ie, outcome and exposure models) are correctly specified. Here, the empirical sandwich variance estimator and the nonparametric bootstrap are demonstrated to be doubly robust variance estimators. That is, they are expected to provide valid estimates of the variance leading to nominal confidence interval coverage when only 1 working model is correctly specified. Simulation studies illustrate the properties of the influence function based, empirical sandwich, and nonparametric bootstrap variance estimators in the setting where parametric working models are assumed. Estimators are applied to data from the Improving Pregnancy Outcomes with Progesterone (IPOP) study to estimate the effect of maternal anemia on birth weight among women with HIV.

BiometricsVol. 81(2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Columbia University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
10.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Double robust variance estimation with parametric working models — Bonnie E. Shook‐Sa, Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, et al. · Biometrics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS