Capturing “Crip Desires” in “Crip Ways”: Developing Inclusive Qualitative Methodologies for Sexualities Research

The intersection of disability and sexuality is an exciting area of scholarship that offers fresh perspectives and critical insights into how disabled people navigate desire, intimacy, and pleasure. This emerging field challenges traditional boundaries within the sociology of sexualities, calling into question who is included in this research and how normative assumptions shape discourse and methodology. Yet despite this growing literature, disabled people remain systematically marginalized in gender and sexuality research. Their voices are often excluded due to institutional gatekeeping and ableist stereotypes that infantilize or hypersexualize them. This article argues for inclusive, participatory qualitative methodologies—rooted in “crip” theoretical frameworks—that recognize disabled people as experts in their own lives. By embracing innovative approaches, such as arts-based and diverse communication methods, researchers can create more accessible spaces that allow disabled people to share their experiences on their own terms. Such approaches facilitate knowledge cocreation and foreground the complexity and richness of disabled people’s sexual and relational worlds. Although progress has been made, substantial gaps remain, particularly for those with intersecting marginalized identities. This article highlights the necessity of centering disabled voices in conversations about sexuality, thereby broadening the sociological imagination and fostering a future in which disabled people’s desires, pleasures, and relationships are not only acknowledged but also celebrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sex & Sexualities
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/3033371251323514
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing “Crip Desires” in “Crip Ways”: Developing Inclusive Qualitative Methodologies for Sexualities Research

Oscar E. Hughes, Alan Santinele Martino, Thomas Tri, Rachell Trung
1 citations
Sex & Sexualities
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
4.20
article

Capturing “Crip Desires” in “Crip Ways”: Developing Inclusive Qualitative Methodologies for Sexualities Research

Oscar E. Hughes, Alan Santinele Martino, Thomas Tri, Rachell Trung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The intersection of disability and sexuality is an exciting area of scholarship that offers fresh perspectives and critical insights into how disabled people navigate desire, intimacy, and pleasure. This emerging field challenges traditional boundaries within the sociology of sexualities, calling into question who is included in this research and how normative assumptions shape discourse and methodology. Yet despite this growing literature, disabled people remain systematically marginalized in gender and sexuality research. Their voices are often excluded due to institutional gatekeeping and ableist stereotypes that infantilize or hypersexualize them. This article argues for inclusive, participatory qualitative methodologies—rooted in “crip” theoretical frameworks—that recognize disabled people as experts in their own lives. By embracing innovative approaches, such as arts-based and diverse communication methods, researchers can create more accessible spaces that allow disabled people to share their experiences on their own terms. Such approaches facilitate knowledge cocreation and foreground the complexity and richness of disabled people’s sexual and relational worlds. Although progress has been made, substantial gaps remain, particularly for those with intersecting marginalized identities. This article highlights the necessity of centering disabled voices in conversations about sexuality, thereby broadening the sociological imagination and fostering a future in which disabled people’s desires, pleasures, and relationships are not only acknowledged but also celebrated.

Sex & SexualitiesVol. 1(1)
University of Calgary (CA), University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Capturing “Crip Desires” in “Crip Ways”: Developing Inclusive Qualitative Methodologies for Sexualities Research — Oscar E. Hughes, Alan Santinele Martino, et al. · Sex & Sexualities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS