Virtual Machines vs. Containerized Environments: A Comparative Study for Malware Analysis

Malware analysis is critical to cybersecurity because it enables researchers and security professionals to better understand threats, their indicators of compromise, and then provide mitigating measures. This paper presents the comparative analysis of two popular malware analysis environments, i.e, Virtual Machines (VMs) and Containerized Environments (CEs). The team evaluated these platforms based on key factors such as isolation, resource usage, startup time, scalability, operating system support and emulation capabilities. Our findings reveal that Virtual Machines offer stronger isolation and better operating system emulation, while Containerized Environments provide faster startup time, better scalability and a lower resource overhead. This study provides a valuable insight for cybersecurity professionals seeking to choose the most suitable environment for malware analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36348/sjet.2025.v10i04.011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual Machines vs. Containerized Environments: A Comparative Study for Malware Analysis

Gideon Emmanuel Oki, Emmanuel Wemogene Sadiq
1 citations
Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
1.49
article

Virtual Machines vs. Containerized Environments: A Comparative Study for Malware Analysis

Gideon Emmanuel Oki, Emmanuel Wemogene Sadiq
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Malware analysis is critical to cybersecurity because it enables researchers and security professionals to better understand threats, their indicators of compromise, and then provide mitigating measures. This paper presents the comparative analysis of two popular malware analysis environments, i.e, Virtual Machines (VMs) and Containerized Environments (CEs). The team evaluated these platforms based on key factors such as isolation, resource usage, startup time, scalability, operating system support and emulation capabilities. Our findings reveal that Virtual Machines offer stronger isolation and better operating system emulation, while Containerized Environments provide faster startup time, better scalability and a lower resource overhead. This study provides a valuable insight for cybersecurity professionals seeking to choose the most suitable environment for malware analysis.

Saudi Journal of Engineering and TechnologyVol. 10(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.