Lung ultrasonography as a tool to detect interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

Abstract Background Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent pulmonary complication in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Lung ultrasonography (LUS) provides a fast, noninvasive method for detecting RA‐ILD, enabling earlier intervention and treatment. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of LUS in identifying RA‐ILD. Methods Systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. Comprehensive database searches were carried out, including PubMed (including MEDLINE and PubMed Central), Scopus, and Cochrane, covering studies published up to September 1, 2024, without restrictions on publication date. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Relevant data on study characteristics and diagnostic performance were extracted, and statistical analyses were performed using R software. Results Nine studies involving 845 participants were included. LUS demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.910 (95% CI: 0.837–0.953), 0.793 (95% CI: 0.509–0.934), and 0.926, respectively, for detecting RA‐ILD. Meta‐analysis of eight studies using the number of B‐lines as the diagnostic criterion yielded pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.906 (95% CI: 0.826–0.952) and 0.739 (95% CI: 0.439–0.911), with an AUC of 0.916. Subgroup analysis of five studies evaluating B‐lines in 14 lung intercostal spaces (LIS) reported sensitivity and specificity of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.746–0.958) and 0.891 (95% CI: 0.612–0.977), respectively. Assessment of a larger number of LIS (72 LIS) yielded higher sensitivity (0.917 [95% CI: 0.798–0.968]) but lower specificity (0.564 [95% CI: 0.440–0.682]). Conclusion LUS demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in detecting ILD in RA patients and holds promise as a valuable screening tool for clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rheumatology & autoimmunity
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rai2.70008
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lung ultrasonography as a tool to detect interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

Rudy Hidayat, Fara Fauzia, Jessica Audrey, Jeremy Rafael Tandaju
2 citations
Rheumatology & autoimmunity
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
3.09
article

Lung ultrasonography as a tool to detect interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

Rudy Hidayat, Fara Fauzia, Jessica Audrey, Jeremy Rafael Tandaju
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent pulmonary complication in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Lung ultrasonography (LUS) provides a fast, noninvasive method for detecting RA‐ILD, enabling earlier intervention and treatment. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of LUS in identifying RA‐ILD. Methods Systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. Comprehensive database searches were carried out, including PubMed (including MEDLINE and PubMed Central), Scopus, and Cochrane, covering studies published up to September 1, 2024, without restrictions on publication date. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Relevant data on study characteristics and diagnostic performance were extracted, and statistical analyses were performed using R software. Results Nine studies involving 845 participants were included. LUS demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.910 (95% CI: 0.837–0.953), 0.793 (95% CI: 0.509–0.934), and 0.926, respectively, for detecting RA‐ILD. Meta‐analysis of eight studies using the number of B‐lines as the diagnostic criterion yielded pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.906 (95% CI: 0.826–0.952) and 0.739 (95% CI: 0.439–0.911), with an AUC of 0.916. Subgroup analysis of five studies evaluating B‐lines in 14 lung intercostal spaces (LIS) reported sensitivity and specificity of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.746–0.958) and 0.891 (95% CI: 0.612–0.977), respectively. Assessment of a larger number of LIS (72 LIS) yielded higher sensitivity (0.917 [95% CI: 0.798–0.968]) but lower specificity (0.564 [95% CI: 0.440–0.682]). Conclusion LUS demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in detecting ILD in RA patients and holds promise as a valuable screening tool for clinical use.

Rheumatology & autoimmunityVol. 5(3)
University of Indonesia (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr Hamka (ID), International University of Batam (ID), Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.