Performance evaluation and improvement of ICESat-2 and GEDI forest canopy height retrievals in Northeast China

The advent of new-generation spaceborne Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) systems, exemplified by the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) and Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), has opened up an unprecedented opportunity for observing forest canopy structures. However, forest canopy height derived from ICESat-2 ATL08 land and vegetation products and GEDI L2A geolocated elevation and height products exhibit varying accuracy across different regions. Low data accuracy limits the broader application of these systems. Moreover, the canopy height detection abilities of the two spaceborne lidar systems in the ecologically important forests of Northeast China require further investigation. In this study, airborne lidar data were used to evaluate the performance of canopy height retrievals from ICESat-2 ATL08 and GEDI L2A, as well as their influencing factors. In addition, a canopy height improvement method, based on a random forest model, was proposed to enhance the accuracy and consistency of canopy height data derived from ICESat-2 and GEDI. The results indicate that the performance of strong beams surpassed that of weak beams in detecting canopy height, with only weak beam data collected during the day recommended for exclusion in ICESat-2 applications. In contrast, for the GEDI mission, the advantages of the power beam were not pronounced, and its performance was better during the day than at night. Compared to ICESat-2, GEDI exhibited lower accuracy in canopy height detection under nighttime conditions or in evergreen needle-leaved forests, but showed greater sensitivity to slope. Moreover, the proposed method increased the coefficient of determination (R2) for ICESat-2 canopy height accuracy from 0.53 to 0.82, and reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) from 3.98 m to 2.00 m. Similarly, the R2 for GEDI improved from 0.52 to 0.80, while RMSE decreased from 4.45 m to 2.41 m. The consistency between ATL08 and GEDI L2A was also improved, with the RMSE reduced by 3.14 m. The findings of this study could provide valuable guidance for the selection and utilization of the two spaceborne lidar data. Canopy height data derived from the improved strategy may enable new opportunities for forest canopy height mapping in Northeast China and support further applications, such as the quantification of aboveground carbon stocks in forests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GIScience & Remote Sensing
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2025.2497603
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance evaluation and improvement of ICESat-2 and GEDI forest canopy height retrievals in Northeast China

Mingjie Chen, Xiangnan Sun, Weisheng Zeng, Cancan Yang et al.
2 citations
GIScience & Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
1.60
article

Performance evaluation and improvement of ICESat-2 and GEDI forest canopy height retrievals in Northeast China

Mingjie Chen, Xiangnan Sun, Weisheng Zeng, Cancan Yang, Nan Zhang, Weitao Li, Longwei Li, Peng Dao-li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The advent of new-generation spaceborne Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) systems, exemplified by the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) and Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), has opened up an unprecedented opportunity for observing forest canopy structures. However, forest canopy height derived from ICESat-2 ATL08 land and vegetation products and GEDI L2A geolocated elevation and height products exhibit varying accuracy across different regions. Low data accuracy limits the broader application of these systems. Moreover, the canopy height detection abilities of the two spaceborne lidar systems in the ecologically important forests of Northeast China require further investigation. In this study, airborne lidar data were used to evaluate the performance of canopy height retrievals from ICESat-2 ATL08 and GEDI L2A, as well as their influencing factors. In addition, a canopy height improvement method, based on a random forest model, was proposed to enhance the accuracy and consistency of canopy height data derived from ICESat-2 and GEDI. The results indicate that the performance of strong beams surpassed that of weak beams in detecting canopy height, with only weak beam data collected during the day recommended for exclusion in ICESat-2 applications. In contrast, for the GEDI mission, the advantages of the power beam were not pronounced, and its performance was better during the day than at night. Compared to ICESat-2, GEDI exhibited lower accuracy in canopy height detection under nighttime conditions or in evergreen needle-leaved forests, but showed greater sensitivity to slope. Moreover, the proposed method increased the coefficient of determination (R2) for ICESat-2 canopy height accuracy from 0.53 to 0.82, and reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) from 3.98 m to 2.00 m. Similarly, the R2 for GEDI improved from 0.52 to 0.80, while RMSE decreased from 4.45 m to 2.41 m. The consistency between ATL08 and GEDI L2A was also improved, with the RMSE reduced by 3.14 m. The findings of this study could provide valuable guidance for the selection and utilization of the two spaceborne lidar data. Canopy height data derived from the improved strategy may enable new opportunities for forest canopy height mapping in Northeast China and support further applications, such as the quantification of aboveground carbon stocks in forests.

GIScience & Remote SensingVol. 62(1)
Beijing Forestry University (CN), Chuzhou University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.