Emergence and Return Times in a Colonial, Cave‐Dwelling Bat: Age and Sex Differences Driven by Reproductive Cycle

The time that bats emerge and subsequently return from a colonial roost determines their maximum foraging period and influences their exposure to mortality risks. The order in which different age and sex cohorts emerge and return reflects variation in these cohorts' resource requirements. The critically endangered Southern Bent-wing Bat (<i>Miniopterus orianae bassanii</i>) is an Australian insectivorous cave-roosting colonial bat. Resource limitation is hypothesised to have contributed to its decline but may not affect all cohorts equally. We tagged and monitored 3462 wild Southern Bent-wing Bats over 7 years with Passive Integrated Transponder technology. To infer resource requirements of different cohorts over the reproductive cycle, we estimated cohort-specific peak emergence and return times and the frequency of nocturnal returns to the roost. The emergence and return behaviour varied with age, sex, and throughout the annual reproductive cycle. Although adult females and males behaved similarly during the non-breeding period (winter), females emerged significantly (12-21 min) earlier and returned (27-62 min) later than males during pregnancy, lactation and weaning. Adult females were less likely than males to be detected overnight in the maternity roost while dependent young were present, suggesting that females prioritised maximising foraging over nocturnal nursing. When juveniles commenced flying, they delayed emergence until several hours after sunset (well after adults had departed the roost). During the 40-day weaning period, they progressively emerged earlier, such that by the end of this period they emerged with the adults, then subsequently foraged for longer than adults over winter. Passive monitoring of emergence and return behaviour in colonial bats can provide valuable data to infer cohort-specific resource requirements. Regular monitoring of a population's emergence and return times potentially allows for the early detection of changes in a resource requirements, and the use of PIT technology allows for the most vulnerable cohort(s) to be identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71281
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergence and Return Times in a Colonial, Cave‐Dwelling Bat: Age and Sex Differences Driven by Reproductive Cycle

Thomas A. A. Prowse, Linda F. Lumsden, Emmi van Harten, Terry Reardon et al.
1 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
3.03
article

Emergence and Return Times in a Colonial, Cave‐Dwelling Bat: Age and Sex Differences Driven by Reproductive Cycle

Thomas A. A. Prowse, Linda F. Lumsden, Emmi van Harten, Terry Reardon, Nicola J. Bail, Paul Clissold
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The time that bats emerge and subsequently return from a colonial roost determines their maximum foraging period and influences their exposure to mortality risks. The order in which different age and sex cohorts emerge and return reflects variation in these cohorts' resource requirements. The critically endangered Southern Bent-wing Bat (<i>Miniopterus orianae bassanii</i>) is an Australian insectivorous cave-roosting colonial bat. Resource limitation is hypothesised to have contributed to its decline but may not affect all cohorts equally. We tagged and monitored 3462 wild Southern Bent-wing Bats over 7 years with Passive Integrated Transponder technology. To infer resource requirements of different cohorts over the reproductive cycle, we estimated cohort-specific peak emergence and return times and the frequency of nocturnal returns to the roost. The emergence and return behaviour varied with age, sex, and throughout the annual reproductive cycle. Although adult females and males behaved similarly during the non-breeding period (winter), females emerged significantly (12-21 min) earlier and returned (27-62 min) later than males during pregnancy, lactation and weaning. Adult females were less likely than males to be detected overnight in the maternity roost while dependent young were present, suggesting that females prioritised maximising foraging over nocturnal nursing. When juveniles commenced flying, they delayed emergence until several hours after sunset (well after adults had departed the roost). During the 40-day weaning period, they progressively emerged earlier, such that by the end of this period they emerged with the adults, then subsequently foraged for longer than adults over winter. Passive monitoring of emergence and return behaviour in colonial bats can provide valuable data to infer cohort-specific resource requirements. Regular monitoring of a population's emergence and return times potentially allows for the early detection of changes in a resource requirements, and the use of PIT technology allows for the most vulnerable cohort(s) to be identified.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(5)
Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research (AU), La Trobe University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, La Trobe University, University of Adelaide, Department of Environment and Water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.