Aural Decoding and Comprehension in L2 Listening

ABSTRACT Studies have established a strong relationship between vocabulary and second language (L2) listening comprehension. While some studies adopted main‐idea scoring for listening comprehension, this study investigated this topic by controlling learners’ proficiency levels and adopting main‐point scoring for analysis. Fifty‐eight Japanese intermediate‐level university students listened to and transcribed two passages and demonstrated their comprehension via free written recall. Their aural decoding and listening comprehension exhibited a correlation of 0.72 overall, and were higher for higher‐proficiency learners than others. Errors that were phonologically similar to the input accounted for most errors. While more errors were observed in function words than in content words, the ratio of errors that were phonologically similar to the input was higher in content words.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12747
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aural Decoding and Comprehension in L2 Listening

Yo Hamada
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Aural Decoding and Comprehension in L2 Listening

Yo Hamada
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Studies have established a strong relationship between vocabulary and second language (L2) listening comprehension. While some studies adopted main‐idea scoring for listening comprehension, this study investigated this topic by controlling learners’ proficiency levels and adopting main‐point scoring for analysis. Fifty‐eight Japanese intermediate‐level university students listened to and transcribed two passages and demonstrated their comprehension via free written recall. Their aural decoding and listening comprehension exhibited a correlation of 0.72 overall, and were higher for higher‐proficiency learners than others. Errors that were phonologically similar to the input accounted for most errors. While more errors were observed in function words than in content words, the ratio of errors that were phonologically similar to the input was higher in content words.

International Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 35(4)
Akita University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Aural Decoding and Comprehension in L2 Listening — Yo Hamada · International Journal of Applied Linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS