From Words to Wounds: Translating Narrative Violence and Ideology in Laut Bercerita (The Sea Speaks His Name)

Abstract. Translating literary works into various languages is a common practice to expand wider audience. In literary works, violence often serves as an instigating element that might unsettle readers, making it a critical challenge for translators to convey while maintaining the nuances of the original text. The novel Laut Bercerita by Leila S. Chudori is one such literary work that best illustrates narrative violence. It depicts the struggle of activists against the authoritarian government during the New Order era. Investigating how narrative violence is re-expressed is essential, as certain forms of violence may not be acceptable in the target language, which highlights the importance of understanding to what extent a translator faithfully transfers such content from the source language to the target one. This study accordingly examines the types of narrative violence based on Slavoj Žižek theory of violence and digs into the translation strategies used by the translator in transferring the narrative violence using Almjirab’s concept of translation strategies. The research then identifies the translator’s ideology in revoicing narrative violence through Venuti’s concepts of foreignization and domestication. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the researcher conducts an in-depth analysis to reveal the proposed problems. The findings unveil three types of violence: subjective violence (84%), systemic violence (14%), and symbolic violence (2%). Moreover, four translation strategies were found: substitution (63%), censorship or omission (20%), taboo for taboo (11%), and euphemism (6%). The study concludes that the translator predominantly employed a domestication ideology, adopting a target language-oriented approach to ensure readability, linguistic acceptance, and emotional resonance. These findings show that domestication enhance the text’s accessibility for the target audience while potentially diminishing the source text’s linguistic and cultural elements. Keywords: translation studies; translation strategies; ideology of translation; taboo words; narrative violence

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eralingua Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v9i1.71232
Primary Topic
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Words to Wounds: Translating Narrative Violence and Ideology in Laut Bercerita (The Sea Speaks His Name)

Raden Pujo Handoyo, Asrofin Nur Kholifah, Ni Made Dewi Cahyadi
Eralingua Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
article

From Words to Wounds: Translating Narrative Violence and Ideology in Laut Bercerita (The Sea Speaks His Name)

Raden Pujo Handoyo, Asrofin Nur Kholifah, Ni Made Dewi Cahyadi
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Translating literary works into various languages is a common practice to expand wider audience. In literary works, violence often serves as an instigating element that might unsettle readers, making it a critical challenge for translators to convey while maintaining the nuances of the original text. The novel Laut Bercerita by Leila S. Chudori is one such literary work that best illustrates narrative violence. It depicts the struggle of activists against the authoritarian government during the New Order era. Investigating how narrative violence is re-expressed is essential, as certain forms of violence may not be acceptable in the target language, which highlights the importance of understanding to what extent a translator faithfully transfers such content from the source language to the target one. This study accordingly examines the types of narrative violence based on Slavoj Žižek theory of violence and digs into the translation strategies used by the translator in transferring the narrative violence using Almjirab’s concept of translation strategies. The research then identifies the translator’s ideology in revoicing narrative violence through Venuti’s concepts of foreignization and domestication. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the researcher conducts an in-depth analysis to reveal the proposed problems. The findings unveil three types of violence: subjective violence (84%), systemic violence (14%), and symbolic violence (2%). Moreover, four translation strategies were found: substitution (63%), censorship or omission (20%), taboo for taboo (11%), and euphemism (6%). The study concludes that the translator predominantly employed a domestication ideology, adopting a target language-oriented approach to ensure readability, linguistic acceptance, and emotional resonance. These findings show that domestication enhance the text’s accessibility for the target audience while potentially diminishing the source text’s linguistic and cultural elements. Keywords: translation studies; translation strategies; ideology of translation; taboo words; narrative violence

Eralingua Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan SastraVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.