Breakthrough Thinking Among Graduate Students

The present study aims to explore breakthrough thinking among postgraduate students and examine differences based on gender (male-female) and specialization (scientific-humanities). To achieve the study's objectives, the researchers adopted the Breakthrough Thinking scale developed by Gerald Puccio (translated by Hanoun, 2018). This scale is based on Puccio’s insight theory, which defines breakthrough thinking as "deep thinking, clarification, and development around a problem to achieve an optimal solution" (Puccio, 2011). The final version of the scale consists of 36 items distributed across four dimensions. The study was conducted on a sample of 300 postgraduate students from various colleges at the University of Thi-Qar, including 143 males and 157 females, selected through a stratified random sampling method. The scale items were analyzed logically and statistically to determine their discriminative ability and validity coefficients. The researchers verified the scale’s face validity, construct validity indicators, and reliability using test-retest and Cronbach's alpha methods, utilizing the SPSS statistical package. The results indicate that postgraduate students possess a high level of breakthrough thinking. Additionally, there are statistically significant differences based on gender in favor of females and based on specialization in favor of humanities students. Based on these findings, several recommendations and suggestions were proposed, including integrating breakthrough thinking strategies into postgraduate curricula to enhance critical thinking and innovative problem-solving. Furthermore, academic advisory programs should be developed to support students in cultivating breakthrough thinking skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1429
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breakthrough Thinking Among Graduate Students

Zainab Jabbar Thajeel, Enaam Qasim Khafeef
Journal of Posthumanism
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Breakthrough Thinking Among Graduate Students

Zainab Jabbar Thajeel, Enaam Qasim Khafeef
article en

Abstract

The present study aims to explore breakthrough thinking among postgraduate students and examine differences based on gender (male-female) and specialization (scientific-humanities). To achieve the study's objectives, the researchers adopted the Breakthrough Thinking scale developed by Gerald Puccio (translated by Hanoun, 2018). This scale is based on Puccio’s insight theory, which defines breakthrough thinking as "deep thinking, clarification, and development around a problem to achieve an optimal solution" (Puccio, 2011). The final version of the scale consists of 36 items distributed across four dimensions. The study was conducted on a sample of 300 postgraduate students from various colleges at the University of Thi-Qar, including 143 males and 157 females, selected through a stratified random sampling method. The scale items were analyzed logically and statistically to determine their discriminative ability and validity coefficients. The researchers verified the scale’s face validity, construct validity indicators, and reliability using test-retest and Cronbach's alpha methods, utilizing the SPSS statistical package. The results indicate that postgraduate students possess a high level of breakthrough thinking. Additionally, there are statistically significant differences based on gender in favor of females and based on specialization in favor of humanities students. Based on these findings, several recommendations and suggestions were proposed, including integrating breakthrough thinking strategies into postgraduate curricula to enhance critical thinking and innovative problem-solving. Furthermore, academic advisory programs should be developed to support students in cultivating breakthrough thinking skills.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(5)
Thi Qar University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.