Functional Outcomes of Patients With Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated With Primary Versus Salvage Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Cohort Study of 41 Patients

Introduction Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an option for patients with complex fractures of the proximal humerus and a salvage option for osteosynthesis failure, fracture sequelae, and hemiarthroplasty (HA) revision. The objective of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of primary RSA for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with those of salvage RSA for the failed treatment of PHFs. We hypothesized that patients undergoing primary RSA would experience significantly less pain and better functional outcomes than those receiving RSA as a salvage procedure. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with PHFs who underwent RSA initially or as a salvage procedure due to failure of conservative treatment, osteosynthesis, or HA. The demographic characteristics of the patients and the radiological features of the initial fracture were considered. Functional outcomes were assessed in terms of range of motion (ROM), the Constant-Murley score (CMS), the subjective shoulder value (SSV), and pain (visual analog scale (VAS)). For the comparative statistical analysis, the t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used. Results Ninety patients underwent RSA, but only 41 patients were included. There were 23 patients in the primary RSA group and 18 in the salvage RSA group, with an average follow-up of 15 months (12-80 months). The primary RSA group experienced significantly less pain (VAS: 0.5±0.13 vs. 1.8±0.40) (p=0.002) and had a better CMS functional index score (73.2±1.6 vs. 65±3.01) (p=0.01) at the end of the follow-up period. No differences in ROM (active anterior elevation and external or internal rotation) or SSV were observed between the two groups. Conclusions In this series of patients, ROM was similar among the patients who underwent primary RSA and those who underwent salvage RSA; however, those who underwent primary RSA had better but not clinically relevant CMS and significantly less pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.83460
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional Outcomes of Patients With Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated With Primary Versus Salvage Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Cohort Study of 41 Patients

Felipe Reinares, Vicente Alba, Nazira Bernal, Cristian Aravena et al.
Cureus
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Functional Outcomes of Patients With Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated With Primary Versus Salvage Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Cohort Study of 41 Patients

Felipe Reinares, Vicente Alba, Nazira Bernal, Cristian Aravena, Daniel Paccot, Andrés Caballero‐Calvo, Antonio Ariztía
article en

Abstract

Introduction Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an option for patients with complex fractures of the proximal humerus and a salvage option for osteosynthesis failure, fracture sequelae, and hemiarthroplasty (HA) revision. The objective of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of primary RSA for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with those of salvage RSA for the failed treatment of PHFs. We hypothesized that patients undergoing primary RSA would experience significantly less pain and better functional outcomes than those receiving RSA as a salvage procedure. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with PHFs who underwent RSA initially or as a salvage procedure due to failure of conservative treatment, osteosynthesis, or HA. The demographic characteristics of the patients and the radiological features of the initial fracture were considered. Functional outcomes were assessed in terms of range of motion (ROM), the Constant-Murley score (CMS), the subjective shoulder value (SSV), and pain (visual analog scale (VAS)). For the comparative statistical analysis, the t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used. Results Ninety patients underwent RSA, but only 41 patients were included. There were 23 patients in the primary RSA group and 18 in the salvage RSA group, with an average follow-up of 15 months (12-80 months). The primary RSA group experienced significantly less pain (VAS: 0.5±0.13 vs. 1.8±0.40) (p=0.002) and had a better CMS functional index score (73.2±1.6 vs. 65±3.01) (p=0.01) at the end of the follow-up period. No differences in ROM (active anterior elevation and external or internal rotation) or SSV were observed between the two groups. Conclusions In this series of patients, ROM was similar among the patients who underwent primary RSA and those who underwent salvage RSA; however, those who underwent primary RSA had better but not clinically relevant CMS and significantly less pain.

CureusVol. 17(5)
Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), Hospital Dipreca (CL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.