Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes Through Live Marking and Socrative: A Formative Assessment Study in Secondary Science Classrooms

This study investigates the effectiveness of two formative assessment strategies—live marking and Socrative—in enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in secondary science classrooms. Conducted in a Birmingham academy school, the study responds to the increasing demand for assessment tools that provide real-time feedback and support responsive teaching. Using a case study design and an interpretivist paradigm, data were gathered from teacher interviews, student questionnaires, classroom observations, and field notes. Thematic and graphical analysis revealed that live marking fostered immediate feedback, improved student motivation, and supported differentiation, particularly for SEND students. Socrative’s real-time data visualisation encouraged self-assessment and active participation, although challenges such as screen fatigue and distractions were noted. Despite time and resource constraints, triangulating feedback from teachers, students, and observations ensured robust insights. The study concludes that these AfL techniques, when implemented thoughtfully, foster inclusive, data-informed teaching that enhances science learning. Implications include the need for balanced integration of digital and traditional tools, tailored feedback strategies, and teacher training to optimise impact. The findings offer practical guidance for science educators aiming to refine formative assessment practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Innovative Studies and Sustainability
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59324/ejiss.2025.1(3).05
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes Through Live Marking and Socrative: A Formative Assessment Study in Secondary Science Classrooms

Excel Obumneme Amaefule
European Journal of Innovative Studies and Sustainability
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes Through Live Marking and Socrative: A Formative Assessment Study in Secondary Science Classrooms

Excel Obumneme Amaefule
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of two formative assessment strategies—live marking and Socrative—in enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in secondary science classrooms. Conducted in a Birmingham academy school, the study responds to the increasing demand for assessment tools that provide real-time feedback and support responsive teaching. Using a case study design and an interpretivist paradigm, data were gathered from teacher interviews, student questionnaires, classroom observations, and field notes. Thematic and graphical analysis revealed that live marking fostered immediate feedback, improved student motivation, and supported differentiation, particularly for SEND students. Socrative’s real-time data visualisation encouraged self-assessment and active participation, although challenges such as screen fatigue and distractions were noted. Despite time and resource constraints, triangulating feedback from teachers, students, and observations ensured robust insights. The study concludes that these AfL techniques, when implemented thoughtfully, foster inclusive, data-informed teaching that enhances science learning. Implications include the need for balanced integration of digital and traditional tools, tailored feedback strategies, and teacher training to optimise impact. The findings offer practical guidance for science educators aiming to refine formative assessment practices.

European Journal of Innovative Studies and SustainabilityVol. 1(3)
Michael Okpara University of Agriculture (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.