Has FDA’s Drug Development Tools Qualification Program Improved Drug Development?
The lengthy and unpredictable nature of the COA Qualification Program review timelines poses a risk for tool developers and sponsors intending to qualify a new COA, to use an existing COA or sponsors intending to qualify and use a new COA in the drug development process. Our findings show that, to date, the DDT Qualification Program has not significantly improved the inclusion of qualified COAs in clinical development plans to support regulatory decision-making and label claims, and therefore the impact of the pathway to facilitate the use of innovative tools has been limited. To improve the utility of this program, FDA should publicly share the timelines so participants can be better prepared to integrate into their development programs. Furthermore, FDA should clearly articulate how and when COAs can be used in drug development.
Authors
- Rasika Kalamegham
- Andrzej Madej (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7626-0840)
- Feng Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-1062)
- Imein Bousnina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-170X)
Institutions
- Howard University (US)
- La Roche College (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
- Published
- 2025-05-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00790-2
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.13