Has FDA’s Drug Development Tools Qualification Program Improved Drug Development?

The lengthy and unpredictable nature of the COA Qualification Program review timelines poses a risk for tool developers and sponsors intending to qualify a new COA, to use an existing COA or sponsors intending to qualify and use a new COA in the drug development process. Our findings show that, to date, the DDT Qualification Program has not significantly improved the inclusion of qualified COAs in clinical development plans to support regulatory decision-making and label claims, and therefore the impact of the pathway to facilitate the use of innovative tools has been limited. To improve the utility of this program, FDA should publicly share the timelines so participants can be better prepared to integrate into their development programs. Furthermore, FDA should clearly articulate how and when COAs can be used in drug development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00790-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Has FDA’s Drug Development Tools Qualification Program Improved Drug Development?

Rasika Kalamegham, Andrzej Madej, Feng Yang, Imein Bousnina
1 citations
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
article

Has FDA’s Drug Development Tools Qualification Program Improved Drug Development?

Rasika Kalamegham, Andrzej Madej, Feng Yang, Imein Bousnina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The lengthy and unpredictable nature of the COA Qualification Program review timelines poses a risk for tool developers and sponsors intending to qualify a new COA, to use an existing COA or sponsors intending to qualify and use a new COA in the drug development process. Our findings show that, to date, the DDT Qualification Program has not significantly improved the inclusion of qualified COAs in clinical development plans to support regulatory decision-making and label claims, and therefore the impact of the pathway to facilitate the use of innovative tools has been limited. To improve the utility of this program, FDA should publicly share the timelines so participants can be better prepared to integrate into their development programs. Furthermore, FDA should clearly articulate how and when COAs can be used in drug development.

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory ScienceVol. 59(4)
Howard University (US), La Roche College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.