Technology Acceptance and Usability of a Therapy System with a Humanoid Robot Serving as Therapeutic Assistant for Post-Stroke Arm and Neurovisual Rehabilitation—An Evaluation Based on Stroke Survivors’ Experience

<b>Background:</b> This study performed an evaluation of technology acceptance of the therapeutic system E-BRAiN (Evidence-Based Robot Assistance in Neurorehabilitation) by stroke survivors receiving therapy with the system. <b>Methods:</b> The evaluation was based on a 49-item questionnaire addressing technology acceptance (I) with its constituents, i.e., perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived adaptability, perceived enjoyment, attitude, trust, anxiety, social influence, perceived sociability, and social presence (41 items), and (II) more general items exploring user experience in terms of both technology acceptance (3 items) and usability (5 open-question items). <b>Results:</b> Eleven consecutive sub-acute stroke survivors who had received either arm rehabilitation sessions (n = 5) or neglect therapy (n = 6) led by a humanoid robot participated. The multidimensional "strength of acceptance" summary statistic (Part I) indicates a high degree of technology acceptance (mean, 4.0; 95% CI, 3.7 to 4.3), as does the "general acceptance" summary statistic (mean, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.3 to 4.9) (art II) (scores ranging from 1, lowest degree of acceptance, to 5, highest degree of acceptance, with a score of 3 as neutral experience anchor). Positive ratings were also documented for all assessed constituents (Part I), as well as the perception that it makes sense to use the robot technology for stroke therapy and as a supplement for users' own therapy (Part II). <b>Conclusions:</b> A high degree of technology acceptance and its constituents, i.e., perceived functionality and social behaviour of the humanoid robot and own emotions while using the system, could be corroborated among stroke survivors who used the therapeutic system E-BRAiN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomimetics
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10050289
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technology Acceptance and Usability of a Therapy System with a Humanoid Robot Serving as Therapeutic Assistant for Post-Stroke Arm and Neurovisual Rehabilitation—An Evaluation Based on Stroke Survivors’ Experience

Ann Louise Pedersen, Thomas Platz, Peter Forbrig, Alexandru-Nicolae Umlauft
1 citations
Biomimetics
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
1.03
article

Technology Acceptance and Usability of a Therapy System with a Humanoid Robot Serving as Therapeutic Assistant for Post-Stroke Arm and Neurovisual Rehabilitation—An Evaluation Based on Stroke Survivors’ Experience

Ann Louise Pedersen, Thomas Platz, Peter Forbrig, Alexandru-Nicolae Umlauft
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> This study performed an evaluation of technology acceptance of the therapeutic system E-BRAiN (Evidence-Based Robot Assistance in Neurorehabilitation) by stroke survivors receiving therapy with the system. <b>Methods:</b> The evaluation was based on a 49-item questionnaire addressing technology acceptance (I) with its constituents, i.e., perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived adaptability, perceived enjoyment, attitude, trust, anxiety, social influence, perceived sociability, and social presence (41 items), and (II) more general items exploring user experience in terms of both technology acceptance (3 items) and usability (5 open-question items). <b>Results:</b> Eleven consecutive sub-acute stroke survivors who had received either arm rehabilitation sessions (n = 5) or neglect therapy (n = 6) led by a humanoid robot participated. The multidimensional "strength of acceptance" summary statistic (Part I) indicates a high degree of technology acceptance (mean, 4.0; 95% CI, 3.7 to 4.3), as does the "general acceptance" summary statistic (mean, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.3 to 4.9) (art II) (scores ranging from 1, lowest degree of acceptance, to 5, highest degree of acceptance, with a score of 3 as neutral experience anchor). Positive ratings were also documented for all assessed constituents (Part I), as well as the perception that it makes sense to use the robot technology for stroke therapy and as a supplement for users' own therapy (Part II). <b>Conclusions:</b> A high degree of technology acceptance and its constituents, i.e., perceived functionality and social behaviour of the humanoid robot and own emotions while using the system, could be corroborated among stroke survivors who used the therapeutic system E-BRAiN.

BiomimeticsVol. 10(5)
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Universität Greifswald (DE), University of Rostock (DE)
European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.