Metagenomic comparison of the microbial load colonizing lucerne hay and gum astralagus (Astragalus glycyphyllos) in ruminants

Context Rumen microbiota plays an important role in the evaluation of roughages. Gum astragalus hay is a non-traditional roughage in ruminant feeding, and it is curious how it affects rumen microbiota in comparison with lucerne hay (LH). Aim This study compares the in vitro true digestibility and rumen fermentation parameters of lucerne hay (LH) and gum astralagus hay (Astragalus glycyphyllos, AG), as well as the metagenomic profile of the bacterial community in sheepruminal fluid following 48 h in vitro incubation with either forage type. Methods The study was carried out in vitro in a Daisy incubator. A total of 100 samples, including 48 samples from each of the experimental roughages and two blind samples, were weighed into F57 bags for in vitro incubation with ruminal fluid, obtained from the rumen of two sheep fed on roughage and brought to the slaughterhouse from a private enterprise. Key results Crude protein (CP) content of AG was higher (P < 0.0014) and ADF content (P < 0.001) was lower than LH. After 48 h incubation of roughage samples, AG was superior to LH in terms of in vitro true digestibility parameters (true digestion of roughages, true dry matter digestion, and true organic matter digestion; P < 0.001). Taxonomy results of bacteria colonizing both roughages were obtained at genus and species level, according to the Shannon and Simpsons index. The bacterial community of the genus Provetalla was dominant in both forages, whereas Pseudomonas genus bacteria were observed in AG, but not in LH. According to the total Operational Taxonomc Units (OTU) in the samples, it was observed that LH and AG had similarity, as well as diversity in terms of species. Due to the current shortage of roughage, it is very important to consider AG as an alternative source of roughage in animal nutrition. Conclusions The differences in nutrient composition between the two roughage types also indicate differences in the composition and density of bacterial microbiota. These results were very important for improving the nutrient utilization efficiency of roughages in the desired direction. Implication The nutrient composition and in vitro digestion parameter results of AG were comparable to LH, and there were similarities, as well as differences, in the colonized bacterial community in both roughages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Production Science
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/an24303
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metagenomic comparison of the microbial load colonizing lucerne hay and gum astralagus (Astragalus glycyphyllos) in ruminants

Mehtap Güney, Şükrü Önalan
Animal Production Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Metagenomic comparison of the microbial load colonizing lucerne hay and gum astralagus (Astragalus glycyphyllos) in ruminants

Mehtap Güney, Şükrü Önalan
article en

Abstract

Context Rumen microbiota plays an important role in the evaluation of roughages. Gum astragalus hay is a non-traditional roughage in ruminant feeding, and it is curious how it affects rumen microbiota in comparison with lucerne hay (LH). Aim This study compares the in vitro true digestibility and rumen fermentation parameters of lucerne hay (LH) and gum astralagus hay (Astragalus glycyphyllos, AG), as well as the metagenomic profile of the bacterial community in sheepruminal fluid following 48 h in vitro incubation with either forage type. Methods The study was carried out in vitro in a Daisy incubator. A total of 100 samples, including 48 samples from each of the experimental roughages and two blind samples, were weighed into F57 bags for in vitro incubation with ruminal fluid, obtained from the rumen of two sheep fed on roughage and brought to the slaughterhouse from a private enterprise. Key results Crude protein (CP) content of AG was higher (P < 0.0014) and ADF content (P < 0.001) was lower than LH. After 48 h incubation of roughage samples, AG was superior to LH in terms of in vitro true digestibility parameters (true digestion of roughages, true dry matter digestion, and true organic matter digestion; P < 0.001). Taxonomy results of bacteria colonizing both roughages were obtained at genus and species level, according to the Shannon and Simpsons index. The bacterial community of the genus Provetalla was dominant in both forages, whereas Pseudomonas genus bacteria were observed in AG, but not in LH. According to the total Operational Taxonomc Units (OTU) in the samples, it was observed that LH and AG had similarity, as well as diversity in terms of species. Due to the current shortage of roughage, it is very important to consider AG as an alternative source of roughage in animal nutrition. Conclusions The differences in nutrient composition between the two roughage types also indicate differences in the composition and density of bacterial microbiota. These results were very important for improving the nutrient utilization efficiency of roughages in the desired direction. Implication The nutrient composition and in vitro digestion parameter results of AG were comparable to LH, and there were similarities, as well as differences, in the colonized bacterial community in both roughages.

Animal Production ScienceVol. 65(7)
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.