Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine if Biomarkers Predict Response to a Pediatric Chronic Pain Symptom Management Program

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), characterized by chronic abdominal pain and significant disability, affect 15-20% of children and adults and continue into adulthood in ~60% of cases. Costs for adults reach USD 30 billion per year, yet effective management strategies are elusive. Studies support using cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), but abdominal pain only improves in ~40% of patients. Dietary management (low FODMAP diet; LFD) has also shown promise but it is effective in only a similar percentage of patients. Studies suggest that biologic factors (biomarkers) contribute to CBT response. Similarly, gut microbiome composition appears to influence abdominal pain response to the LFD. However, no previous CBT trials in children or adults have measured these biomarkers, and it is unclear which patients respond best to CBT vs. LFD. <b>Methods</b>: Children aged 7-12 years with DGBIs (<i>n</i> = 200) will be categorized as having/not having Autonomic Nervous System imbalance and/or abnormalities in gut physiology. We will randomize these children to either CBT or a LFD to compare the effectiveness of these treatments in those with/without abnormal physiologic biomarkers. We hypothesize that CBT will be more effective in those without abnormal physiology and LFD will be more effective in children with abnormal physiology. Primary outcome measures include the following: (1) Symptom improvement (abdominal pain frequency/severity) and (2) improvement in health-related quality of life. <b>Conclusions</b>: This innovative multidisciplinary study is the first to identify physiological characteristics that may moderate the response to two different management strategies. Identification of these characteristics may reduce the burden of these disorders through timely application of the intervention most likely to benefit an individual patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093185
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine if Biomarkers Predict Response to a Pediatric Chronic Pain Symptom Management Program

Katherine Lamparyk, Tasha Murphy, Ann R. McMeans, Rona L. Levy et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
3.62
article

Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine if Biomarkers Predict Response to a Pediatric Chronic Pain Symptom Management Program

Katherine Lamparyk, Tasha Murphy, Ann R. McMeans, Rona L. Levy, Cynthia Boutte, Miranda A.L. van Tilburg, Margaret Heitkemper, Bruno P. Chumpitazi, Robert J. Shulman, Jocelyn Chang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), characterized by chronic abdominal pain and significant disability, affect 15-20% of children and adults and continue into adulthood in ~60% of cases. Costs for adults reach USD 30 billion per year, yet effective management strategies are elusive. Studies support using cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), but abdominal pain only improves in ~40% of patients. Dietary management (low FODMAP diet; LFD) has also shown promise but it is effective in only a similar percentage of patients. Studies suggest that biologic factors (biomarkers) contribute to CBT response. Similarly, gut microbiome composition appears to influence abdominal pain response to the LFD. However, no previous CBT trials in children or adults have measured these biomarkers, and it is unclear which patients respond best to CBT vs. LFD. <b>Methods</b>: Children aged 7-12 years with DGBIs (<i>n</i> = 200) will be categorized as having/not having Autonomic Nervous System imbalance and/or abnormalities in gut physiology. We will randomize these children to either CBT or a LFD to compare the effectiveness of these treatments in those with/without abnormal physiologic biomarkers. We hypothesize that CBT will be more effective in those without abnormal physiology and LFD will be more effective in children with abnormal physiology. Primary outcome measures include the following: (1) Symptom improvement (abdominal pain frequency/severity) and (2) improvement in health-related quality of life. <b>Conclusions</b>: This innovative multidisciplinary study is the first to identify physiological characteristics that may moderate the response to two different management strategies. Identification of these characteristics may reduce the burden of these disorders through timely application of the intervention most likely to benefit an individual patient.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(9)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Akron Children's Hospital (US), Cape Fear Valley Medical Center (US), Children's Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Texas Children's Hospital, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
3.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.