Call broadcast surveys monitor owls with more precision than passive surveys by citizen scientists or acoustic recording units

Context Population monitoring that effectively detects population changes is an important component of threatened species management. Call broadcast surveys are regularly used for robust monitoring of vocal or territorial species; however, they can be resource intensive. Passive monitoring approaches involving citizen scientists and acoustic recording units may be less costly, and consequently these methods are increasingly being advocated. Aims This study investigated the utility of three different monitoring approaches to detect population trends in the Critically Endangered Norfolk Island morepork Ninox novaeseelandiae undulata. It compared the effectiveness of call broadcast with that of passive citizen scientist and acoustic recording surveys. Methods Between November and December 2020, we trialled each technique on Norfolk Island. The coefficient of variation in the number of moreporks heard per survey, and the mean detectability at each site were calculated as the core metrics for each technique. The statistical power of each technique to detect population trends over time was also calculated to compare efficacy. An extensive island-wide call broadcast survey, roost searching, and GPS tracking program were used to establish an independent population estimate. Key results We established a population estimate of 25 individuals. The call broadcast approach had the highest precision and highest site detectability. This approach was also assessed as being capable of detecting a change of just two or three moreporks per year, after three years of monitoring. By contrast, approaches using passive citizen science surveys and acoustic recording units would require at least ten years of monitoring to detect similar population trends. Conclusions Call broadcast surveys had a greater capacity to achieve high detectability and precise monitoring, relative to the passive approaches. Implications The high precision of call broadcast appears to justify the higher resource requirements relative to other methods examined in this study, where the target species is territorial and extremely rare. Call broadcast surveys are recommended for long-term monitoring of Norfolk Island moreporks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Research
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24140
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Call broadcast surveys monitor owls with more precision than passive surveys by citizen scientists or acoustic recording units

Nicholas A. Macgregor, V. Florence Sperring, Michael D. Wilson, Brandon Isaac et al.
1 citations
Wildlife Research
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
1.64
article

Call broadcast surveys monitor owls with more precision than passive surveys by citizen scientists or acoustic recording units

Nicholas A. Macgregor, V. Florence Sperring, Michael D. Wilson, Brandon Isaac, R. H. Clarke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Context Population monitoring that effectively detects population changes is an important component of threatened species management. Call broadcast surveys are regularly used for robust monitoring of vocal or territorial species; however, they can be resource intensive. Passive monitoring approaches involving citizen scientists and acoustic recording units may be less costly, and consequently these methods are increasingly being advocated. Aims This study investigated the utility of three different monitoring approaches to detect population trends in the Critically Endangered Norfolk Island morepork Ninox novaeseelandiae undulata. It compared the effectiveness of call broadcast with that of passive citizen scientist and acoustic recording surveys. Methods Between November and December 2020, we trialled each technique on Norfolk Island. The coefficient of variation in the number of moreporks heard per survey, and the mean detectability at each site were calculated as the core metrics for each technique. The statistical power of each technique to detect population trends over time was also calculated to compare efficacy. An extensive island-wide call broadcast survey, roost searching, and GPS tracking program were used to establish an independent population estimate. Key results We established a population estimate of 25 individuals. The call broadcast approach had the highest precision and highest site detectability. This approach was also assessed as being capable of detecting a change of just two or three moreporks per year, after three years of monitoring. By contrast, approaches using passive citizen science surveys and acoustic recording units would require at least ten years of monitoring to detect similar population trends. Conclusions Call broadcast surveys had a greater capacity to achieve high detectability and precise monitoring, relative to the passive approaches. Implications The high precision of call broadcast appears to justify the higher resource requirements relative to other methods examined in this study, where the target species is territorial and extremely rare. Call broadcast surveys are recommended for long-term monitoring of Norfolk Island moreporks.

Wildlife ResearchVol. 52(5)
University of Canberra (AU), University of Kent (GB), Island Hospital (US), Monash University (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
1.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.