In vitro models of microglia: a comparative study

Microglia perform key homeostatic functions to protect the central nervous system (CNS). However, in many brain disorders their protective functions are abrogated, contributing to disease progression. Therefore, studies of microglial function are critical to developing treatments for brain disorders. Different in vitro microglia models have been established, including primary human and rodent cells, induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived models, and immortalised cell lines. However, a direct comparative analysis of the phenotypic and functional characteristics of these models has not been undertaken. Accurate modelling of human microglia in vitro is critical for ensuring the translatability of results from the bench to the brain. Therefore, our study aimed to characterise and compare commonly utilised in vitro microglia models. We assessed four established microglia models: primary human microglia, human iPSC-derived microglia, the human microglial clone 3 (HMC3) cell line, and primary mouse microglia, with primary human brain pericytes acting as a negative control. Primary human microglia, iPSC-derived microglia, and mouse microglia stained positive for myeloid-cell markers (Iba1, CD45 and PU.1), while HMC3 cells only stained positive for mural-cell markers (PDGFRβ and NG2). Distinct secretomes were observed in all cell models in response to inflammatory treatment, with iPSC-derived microglia showing the most significant inflammatory secretions. Notably, nitric oxide was only secreted by mouse microglia. Although all cell types exhibited phagocytic capacity, primary human microglia and iPSC-derived microglia displayed significantly higher levels of phagocytosis. Overall, comparative analysis revealed notable differences between human microglia, iPSC-derived microglia, HMC3 cells and mouse microglia. Such differences should be considered when using these models to study human brain diseases. Experimental findings obtained from mouse models or cell lines should ultimately be cross validated to ensure the translatability of results to the human condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99867-z
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In vitro models of microglia: a comparative study

Amy M. Smith, Thomas Park, Johanna M. Montgomery, Patrick Schweder et al.
13 citations
Scientific Reports
Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
10.95
article

In vitro models of microglia: a comparative study

Amy M. Smith, Thomas Park, Johanna M. Montgomery, Patrick Schweder, Peter Heppner, Justin Rustenhoven, Blake Highet, Taylor J. Stevenson, Zoe Woolf, Natacha Coppieters, Maria Weinert, Jena Macapagal Foliaki, Kevin Lee, Jason Correia, Michael Dragunow, Ramona Ratiu
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Microglia perform key homeostatic functions to protect the central nervous system (CNS). However, in many brain disorders their protective functions are abrogated, contributing to disease progression. Therefore, studies of microglial function are critical to developing treatments for brain disorders. Different in vitro microglia models have been established, including primary human and rodent cells, induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived models, and immortalised cell lines. However, a direct comparative analysis of the phenotypic and functional characteristics of these models has not been undertaken. Accurate modelling of human microglia in vitro is critical for ensuring the translatability of results from the bench to the brain. Therefore, our study aimed to characterise and compare commonly utilised in vitro microglia models. We assessed four established microglia models: primary human microglia, human iPSC-derived microglia, the human microglial clone 3 (HMC3) cell line, and primary mouse microglia, with primary human brain pericytes acting as a negative control. Primary human microglia, iPSC-derived microglia, and mouse microglia stained positive for myeloid-cell markers (Iba1, CD45 and PU.1), while HMC3 cells only stained positive for mural-cell markers (PDGFRβ and NG2). Distinct secretomes were observed in all cell models in response to inflammatory treatment, with iPSC-derived microglia showing the most significant inflammatory secretions. Notably, nitric oxide was only secreted by mouse microglia. Although all cell types exhibited phagocytic capacity, primary human microglia and iPSC-derived microglia displayed significantly higher levels of phagocytosis. Overall, comparative analysis revealed notable differences between human microglia, iPSC-derived microglia, HMC3 cells and mouse microglia. Such differences should be considered when using these models to study human brain diseases. Experimental findings obtained from mouse models or cell lines should ultimately be cross validated to ensure the translatability of results to the human condition.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Auckland (NZ), Auckland City Hospital (NZ), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB), Neurological Surgery (US)
University of Auckland
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
10.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.