Gender Attitudes, Inequality and Migration Decision‐Making

ABSTRACT We explore the role of gender‐unequal attitudes towards gender norms and perceived structural gender inequality in the migration decision‐making of men and women. Adopting a conceptual model based on possible selves theory, the research employs a contextual social identity perspective concerning gender. We posit that the disparate spheres of inequality experienced by women relative to men should have a distinct relationship with the constituent elements of migration decision‐making per gender. We expect a negative (positive) relationship between more conservative gender attitudes and women's (men's) aspirations to migrate. Similarly, gender inequalities concerning structural opportunities should have a negative (positive) relationship with women's (men's) expectation to migrate. We explore these propositions using survey data from a sample of 11,563 young adults aged 18‐39 from Afghanistan, Cabo Verde, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, Tunisia and Turkey. The results provide insights regarding the role of gender‐unequal attitudes and structural gender inequality in migration decision‐making. More conservative gender‐unequal attitudes are associated with a lower preference for migration among women. More conservative gender‐unequal attitudes have no statistically significant relationship with a preference for migration among men. On the other hand, higher perceived structural gender inequality is linked to higher expectations of migration for men, but with no statistically significant indication for women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Population Space and Place
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70044
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Attitudes, Inequality and Migration Decision‐Making

Sandra Morgenstern, Carlos Vargas‐Silva
1 citations
Population Space and Place
Migration and Labor Dynamics
4.20
article

Gender Attitudes, Inequality and Migration Decision‐Making

Sandra Morgenstern, Carlos Vargas‐Silva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We explore the role of gender‐unequal attitudes towards gender norms and perceived structural gender inequality in the migration decision‐making of men and women. Adopting a conceptual model based on possible selves theory, the research employs a contextual social identity perspective concerning gender. We posit that the disparate spheres of inequality experienced by women relative to men should have a distinct relationship with the constituent elements of migration decision‐making per gender. We expect a negative (positive) relationship between more conservative gender attitudes and women's (men's) aspirations to migrate. Similarly, gender inequalities concerning structural opportunities should have a negative (positive) relationship with women's (men's) expectation to migrate. We explore these propositions using survey data from a sample of 11,563 young adults aged 18‐39 from Afghanistan, Cabo Verde, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, Tunisia and Turkey. The results provide insights regarding the role of gender‐unequal attitudes and structural gender inequality in migration decision‐making. More conservative gender‐unequal attitudes are associated with a lower preference for migration among women. More conservative gender‐unequal attitudes have no statistically significant relationship with a preference for migration among men. On the other hand, higher perceived structural gender inequality is linked to higher expectations of migration for men, but with no statistically significant indication for women.

Population Space and PlaceVol. 31(4)
University of Mannheim (DE), University of Oxford (GB), Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (DE)
European Commission
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.