A Comparative Study of a Two-Dimensional Slope Hydrodynamic Model (TDSHM), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Models for Runoff Prediction

Accurate runoff prediction in complex slope catchments remains challenging due to terrain heterogeneity and dynamic rainfall interactions. This study conducts a systematic comparison between a physics-based Two-Dimensional Slope Hydrodynamic Model (TDSHM) and data-driven deep learning models (LSTM and CNN) for runoff forecasting under variable rainfall conditions. Using 214 rainfall–runoff events (2013–2023) from the Qiaotou watershed in Nanjing, China, the TDSHM integrates rainfall momentum, wind effects, and hydrodynamic principles to resolve spatiotemporal flow dynamics, while LSTM and CNN models leverage seven hydrological features for data-driven predictions. Results demonstrate that the TDSHM achieved superior accuracy, with a mean relative error of 10.77%, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.801, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 3.17 mm, outperforming LSTM (24.38% error, NSE = 0.751, MAE = 4.61 mm) and CNN (28.10% error, NSE = 0.506, MAE = 6.82 mm). The TDSHM’s explicit physical interpretability enabled precise simulation of vegetation-modulated runoff processes, validated against field observations (92% predictions within ±15% error). While LSTM captured temporal dependencies effectively, CNN exhibited limitations in sequential data processing. This study highlights the TDSHM’s robustness for scenarios requiring mechanistic insights and the complementary role of LSTM in data-rich environments. The findings provide critical guidance for flood risk management, soil conservation, and model selection trade-offs between physical fidelity and computational efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17091380
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of a Two-Dimensional Slope Hydrodynamic Model (TDSHM), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Models for Runoff Prediction

Guangcheng Shao, Zhou Yuhao, Jing Pan
7 citations
Water
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
5.72
article

A Comparative Study of a Two-Dimensional Slope Hydrodynamic Model (TDSHM), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Models for Runoff Prediction

Guangcheng Shao, Zhou Yuhao, Jing Pan
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Accurate runoff prediction in complex slope catchments remains challenging due to terrain heterogeneity and dynamic rainfall interactions. This study conducts a systematic comparison between a physics-based Two-Dimensional Slope Hydrodynamic Model (TDSHM) and data-driven deep learning models (LSTM and CNN) for runoff forecasting under variable rainfall conditions. Using 214 rainfall–runoff events (2013–2023) from the Qiaotou watershed in Nanjing, China, the TDSHM integrates rainfall momentum, wind effects, and hydrodynamic principles to resolve spatiotemporal flow dynamics, while LSTM and CNN models leverage seven hydrological features for data-driven predictions. Results demonstrate that the TDSHM achieved superior accuracy, with a mean relative error of 10.77%, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.801, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 3.17 mm, outperforming LSTM (24.38% error, NSE = 0.751, MAE = 4.61 mm) and CNN (28.10% error, NSE = 0.506, MAE = 6.82 mm). The TDSHM’s explicit physical interpretability enabled precise simulation of vegetation-modulated runoff processes, validated against field observations (92% predictions within ±15% error). While LSTM captured temporal dependencies effectively, CNN exhibited limitations in sequential data processing. This study highlights the TDSHM’s robustness for scenarios requiring mechanistic insights and the complementary role of LSTM in data-rich environments. The findings provide critical guidance for flood risk management, soil conservation, and model selection trade-offs between physical fidelity and computational efficiency.

WaterVol. 17(9)
Hohai University (CN), Nanjing Polytechnic Institute (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of a Two-Dimensional Slope Hydrodynamic Model (TDSHM), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Models for Runoff Prediction — Guangcheng Shao, Zhou Yuhao, et al. · Water (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS