Legal Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Medical Care: Impacts on Practice among Mental Health Professionals

<i>In 2023, the state of Florida enacted legislation that imposed significant restrictions on access to gender-affirming medical care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals. These restrictions included a comprehensive ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors, with some exceptions for minors already receiving treatment. For adults, access was restricted by prohibiting nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and physician’s assistants from prescribing or administering hormone therapies. Further restrictions were effected by prohibiting Medicaid from funding gender-affirming medical care and by requiring in-person consent, thereby excluding telehealth options for consent. This study investigated the impacts of these restrictions by inviting licensed mental health professionals to share their experiences of how their practices with transgender and gender-diverse clients had changed since implementation of this law. Upon analyzing the interviews with these mental health professionals, six themes emerged: (1) Some participants stopped or reduced their services for transgender and gender diverse clients; (2) Some participants changed their practice to ensure safe and affirming spaces for their clients; (3) Some participants became more involved in advocacy and adaptating their services to help transgender and gender-diverse address the new challenges posed by SB-254; (4) Some participants experienced confusion, fear, and anxiety as a result of SB-254; (5) Some participants focused more on education and legal understanding; and (6) Although most participants indicated substantial changes in their practice, two participants suggested that SB-254 had no substantial impact on their practice with TGD clients.</i>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Qualitative Research
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/16242
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Medical Care: Impacts on Practice among Mental Health Professionals

Allan Barsky, David Simpson
1 links
American Journal of Qualitative Research
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Legal Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Medical Care: Impacts on Practice among Mental Health Professionals

Allan Barsky, David Simpson
article en

Abstract

<i>In 2023, the state of Florida enacted legislation that imposed significant restrictions on access to gender-affirming medical care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals. These restrictions included a comprehensive ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors, with some exceptions for minors already receiving treatment. For adults, access was restricted by prohibiting nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and physician’s assistants from prescribing or administering hormone therapies. Further restrictions were effected by prohibiting Medicaid from funding gender-affirming medical care and by requiring in-person consent, thereby excluding telehealth options for consent. This study investigated the impacts of these restrictions by inviting licensed mental health professionals to share their experiences of how their practices with transgender and gender-diverse clients had changed since implementation of this law. Upon analyzing the interviews with these mental health professionals, six themes emerged: (1) Some participants stopped or reduced their services for transgender and gender diverse clients; (2) Some participants changed their practice to ensure safe and affirming spaces for their clients; (3) Some participants became more involved in advocacy and adaptating their services to help transgender and gender-diverse address the new challenges posed by SB-254; (4) Some participants experienced confusion, fear, and anxiety as a result of SB-254; (5) Some participants focused more on education and legal understanding; and (6) Although most participants indicated substantial changes in their practice, two participants suggested that SB-254 had no substantial impact on their practice with TGD clients.</i>

American Journal of Qualitative ResearchVol. 9(2)
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.