Pilot Testing an Ecotherapy Program for Adolescence: Initial Findings and Methodological Reflections

Children and young people's mental health and well-being has seen a dramatic decline. In the UK, this has been exacerbated by service retrenchment associated with austerity, with evidence of increasing health inequalities. Service innovation that is grounded in practice, has ongoing learning, and is co-designed with children and young people is required now. This can provide creative solutions within the local context and contribute to the fledgling evidence base that explores complex mechanisms of impact. This methodological reflection describes a co-design process of a bespoke, group-based ecotherapy programme: from early piloting using appreciative enquiry before COVID-19 by the mental health, public health, and Street Services team in the port city of Plymouth, to further developing an evaluation framework through an innovative, matched-funded academia-practice partnership. The findings showcase the benefits of a systems-based approach to public, multi-agency and academic collaboration, facilitated by peer and practitioner researchers and embedded researchers-in-residence. They highlight the need to consider nuances of specific (connecting with self, others, animals, nature) and non-specific active ingredients of the emerging and constantly adapting service (therapeutic relationship with practitioners/carers; nature as therapist, and group dynamics), as well as the value of pragmatic and participatory evaluation methods (distance-travelled, goal-based measures; and ethnographic, qualitative observation), to provide rapid, continuous, and real-time learning and improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050720
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health, psychology, and well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pilot Testing an Ecotherapy Program for Adolescence: Initial Findings and Methodological Reflections

Samuel Hawley, Ruth Harrell, Felix Gradinger, Gary Wallace et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Health, psychology, and well-being
5.63
article

Pilot Testing an Ecotherapy Program for Adolescence: Initial Findings and Methodological Reflections

Samuel Hawley, Ruth Harrell, Felix Gradinger, Gary Wallace, Sophie Westwood, Sheena Asthana, J. Kent Griffiths, John Marley, R Bates, Thomas O. Maguire, Grace Edmunds-Jones, Hannah Avent
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Children and young people's mental health and well-being has seen a dramatic decline. In the UK, this has been exacerbated by service retrenchment associated with austerity, with evidence of increasing health inequalities. Service innovation that is grounded in practice, has ongoing learning, and is co-designed with children and young people is required now. This can provide creative solutions within the local context and contribute to the fledgling evidence base that explores complex mechanisms of impact. This methodological reflection describes a co-design process of a bespoke, group-based ecotherapy programme: from early piloting using appreciative enquiry before COVID-19 by the mental health, public health, and Street Services team in the port city of Plymouth, to further developing an evaluation framework through an innovative, matched-funded academia-practice partnership. The findings showcase the benefits of a systems-based approach to public, multi-agency and academic collaboration, facilitated by peer and practitioner researchers and embedded researchers-in-residence. They highlight the need to consider nuances of specific (connecting with self, others, animals, nature) and non-specific active ingredients of the emerging and constantly adapting service (therapeutic relationship with practitioners/carers; nature as therapist, and group dynamics), as well as the value of pragmatic and participatory evaluation methods (distance-travelled, goal-based measures; and ethnographic, qualitative observation), to provide rapid, continuous, and real-time learning and improvement.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(5)
Plymouth City Council (GB), University of Plymouth (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health, psychology, and well-being
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.