An Assessment of Clinician Knowledge of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating skin disease primarily diagnosed through clinical examination. Despite its characteristic clinical features, HS remains under-recognized and frequently misclassified, especially by non-dermatologist clinicians. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HS across various specialties, identify knowledge gaps, and inform targeted educational strategies to reduce diagnostic delays. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted during multidisciplinary scientific conferences, enrolling 655 clinicians including dermatologists, gynecologists, urologists, general surgeons, and general practitioners. Participants were presented with clinical images representing HS lesions at Hurley stages I-III and responded to open-ended and closed-ended diagnostic questions. Data were analyzed to assess diagnostic accuracy and compare recognition patterns across specialties. <b>Results:</b> The recognition of HS varied significantly by specialty and disease stage. For Hurley stage III axillary disease, correct identification was highest among dermatologists (96.56%) compared to general practitioners (48.91%), gynecologists (31.25%), urologists (40%), and general surgeons (63.64%). In a Hurley II genital case in a male patient, only 34.5% diagnosed HS, while 25.65% suggested furunculosis and 16.18% venereal granuloma. For a Hurley I genital case in a female patient, 29.92% diagnosed HS, with furunculosis (23.36%) and steatocystoma multiplex (14.35%) as common misdiagnoses. A Hurley III buttock case was correctly identified by only 29.77% of participants. <b>Conclusions:</b> This large, first-of-its-kind global survey highlights substantial gaps in HS recognition, particularly among non-dermatologist clinicians. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted, multidisciplinary educational interventions to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce delays, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes in HS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093171
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Assessment of Clinician Knowledge of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey Study

Łukasz Matusiak, Rafał Stojko, Klaudia Knecht-Gurwin, Tomasz Drewa et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Treatments
4.01
article

An Assessment of Clinician Knowledge of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey Study

Łukasz Matusiak, Rafał Stojko, Klaudia Knecht-Gurwin, Tomasz Drewa, Adam Gurwin, Magdalena Łyko, Jacek Cezary Szepietowski, Agnieszka Mastalerz–Migas, Wojciech Kielan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating skin disease primarily diagnosed through clinical examination. Despite its characteristic clinical features, HS remains under-recognized and frequently misclassified, especially by non-dermatologist clinicians. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HS across various specialties, identify knowledge gaps, and inform targeted educational strategies to reduce diagnostic delays. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted during multidisciplinary scientific conferences, enrolling 655 clinicians including dermatologists, gynecologists, urologists, general surgeons, and general practitioners. Participants were presented with clinical images representing HS lesions at Hurley stages I-III and responded to open-ended and closed-ended diagnostic questions. Data were analyzed to assess diagnostic accuracy and compare recognition patterns across specialties. <b>Results:</b> The recognition of HS varied significantly by specialty and disease stage. For Hurley stage III axillary disease, correct identification was highest among dermatologists (96.56%) compared to general practitioners (48.91%), gynecologists (31.25%), urologists (40%), and general surgeons (63.64%). In a Hurley II genital case in a male patient, only 34.5% diagnosed HS, while 25.65% suggested furunculosis and 16.18% venereal granuloma. For a Hurley I genital case in a female patient, 29.92% diagnosed HS, with furunculosis (23.36%) and steatocystoma multiplex (14.35%) as common misdiagnoses. A Hurley III buttock case was correctly identified by only 29.77% of participants. <b>Conclusions:</b> This large, first-of-its-kind global survey highlights substantial gaps in HS recognition, particularly among non-dermatologist clinicians. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted, multidisciplinary educational interventions to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce delays, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes in HS.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(9)
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Slaskich we Wroclawiu
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Treatments
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.