Modes of Cognition: Implications for Large Language Models

In “Modes of Cognition: Implications for Large Language Models”, N. Katherine Hayles proposes a broadened framework for understanding cognition, extending it beyond conscious human thought to include implicit, nonconscious, and even non-neural processes. Using the SIRAL criteria—sensing, interpreting, responding, anticipating, and learning—she explores cognition across organisms from bacteria to plants, arguing that many life forms meet the cognitive threshold despite lacking brains. Hayles then applies these insights to large language models (LLMs), contending that their behavior satisfies the modified SIRAL criteria. Although LLMs lack physical embodiment, they navigate and interpret vast conceptual environments, produce flexible and anticipatory responses, and learn from data. Their cognitive capacities, she argues, stem not from consciousness but from their place within a broader evolutionary lineage of technics. By reframing cognition and decentering anthropocentric models, Hayles opens pathways to new ethical frameworks for engaging with artificial and biological intelligences alike.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/anti.5czf
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modes of Cognition: Implications for Large Language Models

N. Katherine Hayles
2 citations
Topic Modeling
4.96
article

Modes of Cognition: Implications for Large Language Models

N. Katherine Hayles
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In “Modes of Cognition: Implications for Large Language Models”, N. Katherine Hayles proposes a broadened framework for understanding cognition, extending it beyond conscious human thought to include implicit, nonconscious, and even non-neural processes. Using the SIRAL criteria—sensing, interpreting, responding, anticipating, and learning—she explores cognition across organisms from bacteria to plants, arguing that many life forms meet the cognitive threshold despite lacking brains. Hayles then applies these insights to large language models (LLMs), contending that their behavior satisfies the modified SIRAL criteria. Although LLMs lack physical embodiment, they navigate and interpret vast conceptual environments, produce flexible and anticipatory responses, and learn from data. Their cognitive capacities, she argues, stem not from consciousness but from their place within a broader evolutionary lineage of technics. By reframing cognition and decentering anthropocentric models, Hayles opens pathways to new ethical frameworks for engaging with artificial and biological intelligences alike.

University of California, Los Angeles (US), Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Topic Modeling
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modes of Cognition: Implications for Large Language Models — N. Katherine Hayles · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS