Impact of relative estradiol changes during ovarian stimulation on blastocyst formation and live birth in assisted reproductive technology

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of relative change in E2 levels during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) on embryo development and pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). We retrospectively analyzed 9,376 patients who underwent their first fresh ART cycle from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Patients were classified into four groups based on relative change in E2 levels: low response group, moderate response group, moderate-high response group, and high response group. The primary outcomes were blastocyst formation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate, while secondary outcomes included miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate. Most cycles (96.5%) demonstrated an increase in E2 levels during COS. The blastocyst formation rate significantly increased across the groups (low response group: 0.13, moderate response group: 0.21, moderate-high response group: 0.28, high response group: 0.34; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher blastocyst formation rates in the moderate response group (adjusted OR = 2.012, 95% CI: 1.687-2.399), moderate-high response group (adjusted OR = 4.613, 95% CI: 3.853-5.523), and high response group (adjusted OR = 11.295, 95% CI: 9.192-13.880) compared to the low response group. Both clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were significantly higher in the moderate-high response group and high response group compared to the low response group (clinical pregnancy rate: 54.5% and 61.5% vs. 35.5%, adjusted RR = 1.21 [95% CI: 1.03-1.42] and 1.27 [95% CI: 1.08-1.51]; live birth rate: 44.9% and 52.0% vs. 25.7%, adjusted RR = 1.27 [95% CI: 1.06-1.52] and 1.35 [95% CI: 1.11-1.64]). However, no significant differences were observed in either clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate between the moderate response group and low response group (clinical pregnancy rate: adjusted RR = 1.07 [95% CI: 0.91-1.25]; live birth rate: adjusted RR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.92-1.33]). No significant differences in miscarriage rate or ectopic pregnancy rate were observed across the groups. Higher E2 responses were associated with improved embryo development and better pregnancy outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00200-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of relative estradiol changes during ovarian stimulation on blastocyst formation and live birth in assisted reproductive technology

Lihui Wei, Ni Tang, Qiuyue Wen, Zhao Qin et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
5.64
article

Impact of relative estradiol changes during ovarian stimulation on blastocyst formation and live birth in assisted reproductive technology

Lihui Wei, Ni Tang, Qiuyue Wen, Zhao Qin, Linyan Xu, Jingjing Li, Juan Tang, Li Fan, Wenjie Huang, Liuying Nong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of relative change in E2 levels during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) on embryo development and pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). We retrospectively analyzed 9,376 patients who underwent their first fresh ART cycle from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Patients were classified into four groups based on relative change in E2 levels: low response group, moderate response group, moderate-high response group, and high response group. The primary outcomes were blastocyst formation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate, while secondary outcomes included miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate. Most cycles (96.5%) demonstrated an increase in E2 levels during COS. The blastocyst formation rate significantly increased across the groups (low response group: 0.13, moderate response group: 0.21, moderate-high response group: 0.28, high response group: 0.34; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher blastocyst formation rates in the moderate response group (adjusted OR = 2.012, 95% CI: 1.687-2.399), moderate-high response group (adjusted OR = 4.613, 95% CI: 3.853-5.523), and high response group (adjusted OR = 11.295, 95% CI: 9.192-13.880) compared to the low response group. Both clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were significantly higher in the moderate-high response group and high response group compared to the low response group (clinical pregnancy rate: 54.5% and 61.5% vs. 35.5%, adjusted RR = 1.21 [95% CI: 1.03-1.42] and 1.27 [95% CI: 1.08-1.51]; live birth rate: 44.9% and 52.0% vs. 25.7%, adjusted RR = 1.27 [95% CI: 1.06-1.52] and 1.35 [95% CI: 1.11-1.64]). However, no significant differences were observed in either clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate between the moderate response group and low response group (clinical pregnancy rate: adjusted RR = 1.07 [95% CI: 0.91-1.25]; live birth rate: adjusted RR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.92-1.33]). No significant differences in miscarriage rate or ectopic pregnancy rate were observed across the groups. Higher E2 responses were associated with improved embryo development and better pregnancy outcomes.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
5.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.