THERMOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND FIELD PERFORMANCE OF SMALL ARMS PROPELLANTS FROM 1953 (30-06 M2 AP) AND 2012 (M55A1) AMMUNITION

When older stocks of ammunition are fielded for use, propellant degradation may alter chamber pressures, or in the worst-case scenario, may present risk for auto-ignition. Propellants harvested from U.S military cartridges—1953 30-06 M2 AP and 2012 M855A1 were evaluated using thermochemical techniques and field testing. Thermal analysis demonstrated similar energy densities between 1953, 2012, and 2022-era propellants with similar morphology. Minor changes in activation energy and stabilizer content suggested slightly decreased propellant thermal stability in the 1953 propellant. A novel application of modified thermogravimetric analysis (mTGA) is introduced and shows promise for more rapidly determining the properties of older stocks of ammunition being considered for use. In field testing, the 1953-era propellant demonstrated comparable standard deviations in velocity and on-target precision to the 2012 propellant, and both resulted in similar standard deviations in velocity and on-target performance to a modern extruded commercial reloading powder.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12783/ballistics25/37118
Primary Topic
Rocket and propulsion systems research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THERMOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND FIELD PERFORMANCE OF SMALL ARMS PROPELLANTS FROM 1953 (30-06 M2 AP) AND 2012 (M55A1) AMMUNITION

Michael Courtney, Amy Courtney, Benjamin Streifel
Rocket and propulsion systems research
article

THERMOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND FIELD PERFORMANCE OF SMALL ARMS PROPELLANTS FROM 1953 (30-06 M2 AP) AND 2012 (M55A1) AMMUNITION

Michael Courtney, Amy Courtney, Benjamin Streifel
article en

Abstract

When older stocks of ammunition are fielded for use, propellant degradation may alter chamber pressures, or in the worst-case scenario, may present risk for auto-ignition. Propellants harvested from U.S military cartridges—1953 30-06 M2 AP and 2012 M855A1 were evaluated using thermochemical techniques and field testing. Thermal analysis demonstrated similar energy densities between 1953, 2012, and 2022-era propellants with similar morphology. Minor changes in activation energy and stabilizer content suggested slightly decreased propellant thermal stability in the 1953 propellant. A novel application of modified thermogravimetric analysis (mTGA) is introduced and shows promise for more rapidly determining the properties of older stocks of ammunition being considered for use. In field testing, the 1953-era propellant demonstrated comparable standard deviations in velocity and on-target precision to the 2012 propellant, and both resulted in similar standard deviations in velocity and on-target performance to a modern extruded commercial reloading powder.

Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Rocket and propulsion systems research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THERMOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND FIELD PERFORMANCE OF SMALL ARMS PROPELLANTS FROM 1953 (30-06 M2 AP) AND 2012 (M55A1) AMMUNITION — Michael Courtney, Amy Courtney, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS