COMPLEX THINKING AND THE PROJECT PORTFOLIO IN PHILANTHROPIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS

Working within a highly volatile scenario and subject to numerous interrelationships, institutions in the philanthropic healthcare sector must navigate both the efficiency and flexibility, characteristic of private entities, while retaining the focus on the purpose of social equity, typical of public entities. This dichotomy renders the implementation of a project portfolio a significant challenge. It was in recognition of the inherent features of this scenario that this research grounded its development in complex thinking. This allowed for learning rather than the imposition of pre-determinism, and critical reflection instead of hypothesis testing. Given the systemic nature of this research, the Soft System Methodology was chosen as the approach. Conducted within a philanthropic institution dedicated to oncological treatment, this unique case study originated from comprehending the organizational context through the lens of complex thinking to formulate an action plan centered on the implementation and management of a project portfolio. The outcomes demonstrated that steering this process guided by complex thinking enables greater flexibility and agility in project selection, as well as enhanced integration among stakeholders, along with reduced maturation time in the initiation and planning phases. On the other hand, this adoption opens discussions about the challenges of employing a holistic line of thought within a culture rooted predominantly in the positivist paradigm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Society
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51249/hs.v5i02.2494
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPLEX THINKING AND THE PROJECT PORTFOLIO IN PHILANTHROPIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS

Jefferson Henrique dos Santos Silva, Rafael Giacomassi
Health and Society
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

COMPLEX THINKING AND THE PROJECT PORTFOLIO IN PHILANTHROPIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS

Jefferson Henrique dos Santos Silva, Rafael Giacomassi
article en

Abstract

Working within a highly volatile scenario and subject to numerous interrelationships, institutions in the philanthropic healthcare sector must navigate both the efficiency and flexibility, characteristic of private entities, while retaining the focus on the purpose of social equity, typical of public entities. This dichotomy renders the implementation of a project portfolio a significant challenge. It was in recognition of the inherent features of this scenario that this research grounded its development in complex thinking. This allowed for learning rather than the imposition of pre-determinism, and critical reflection instead of hypothesis testing. Given the systemic nature of this research, the Soft System Methodology was chosen as the approach. Conducted within a philanthropic institution dedicated to oncological treatment, this unique case study originated from comprehending the organizational context through the lens of complex thinking to formulate an action plan centered on the implementation and management of a project portfolio. The outcomes demonstrated that steering this process guided by complex thinking enables greater flexibility and agility in project selection, as well as enhanced integration among stakeholders, along with reduced maturation time in the initiation and planning phases. On the other hand, this adoption opens discussions about the challenges of employing a holistic line of thought within a culture rooted predominantly in the positivist paradigm.

Health and SocietyVol. 5(02)
Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Gansu Great Wall Electrical and Electronics Engineering Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.