ADAPTIVE OPTIMISATION OF EXPLOSIVE REACTIVE ARMOUR FOR PROTECTION AGAINST KINETIC ENERGY AND SHAPED CHARGE THREATS

We evaluate an adaptive optimisation methodology, Bayesian optimisation (BO), for designing a minimum weight explosive reactive armour (ERA) for protection against a surrogate medium calibre kinetic energy (KE) long rod projectile and surrogate shaped charge (SC) warhead. We perform the optimisation using a conventional BO methodology and compare it with a conventional trial-and-error approach from a human expert. A third approach, utilising a novel human-machine teaming framework for BO is also evaluated. Data for the optimisation is generated using numerical simulations that are demonstrated to provide reasonable qualitative agreement with reference experiments. The human-machine teaming methodology is shown to identify the optimum ERA design in the fewest number of evaluations, outperforming both the stand-alone human and stand-alone BO methodologies. From a design space of almost 1800 configurations the human-machine teaming approach identifies the minimum weight ERA design in 10 samples. This is an extended abstract of a paper published in Defence Technology.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12783/ballistics25/37081
Primary Topic
Energetic Materials and Combustion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ADAPTIVE OPTIMISATION OF EXPLOSIVE REACTIVE ARMOUR FOR PROTECTION AGAINST KINETIC ENERGY AND SHAPED CHARGE THREATS

Shannon Ryan, Christopher Lange, Santu Rana, Julian Berk et al.
Energetic Materials and Combustion
article

ADAPTIVE OPTIMISATION OF EXPLOSIVE REACTIVE ARMOUR FOR PROTECTION AGAINST KINETIC ENERGY AND SHAPED CHARGE THREATS

Shannon Ryan, Christopher Lange, Santu Rana, Julian Berk, Jérôme Limido, Svetha Venkatesh, Andreas Klavzar, Philipp Moldtmann
article en

Abstract

We evaluate an adaptive optimisation methodology, Bayesian optimisation (BO), for designing a minimum weight explosive reactive armour (ERA) for protection against a surrogate medium calibre kinetic energy (KE) long rod projectile and surrogate shaped charge (SC) warhead. We perform the optimisation using a conventional BO methodology and compare it with a conventional trial-and-error approach from a human expert. A third approach, utilising a novel human-machine teaming framework for BO is also evaluated. Data for the optimisation is generated using numerical simulations that are demonstrated to provide reasonable qualitative agreement with reference experiments. The human-machine teaming methodology is shown to identify the optimum ERA design in the fewest number of evaluations, outperforming both the stand-alone human and stand-alone BO methodologies. From a design space of almost 1800 configurations the human-machine teaming approach identifies the minimum weight ERA design in 10 samples. This is an extended abstract of a paper published in Defence Technology.

Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Energetic Materials and Combustion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.