A mixed integer linear programming framework for mitigating enteric methane emissions on dairy farms through optimized crop and diet planning

In pursuit of agricultural resilience and sustainability, the European Union (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) advocates for effective and diverse crop rotations. Yet, dairy farmers face intricate planning challenges due to diet and market complexities. This study introduces a novel mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model that optimizes both crop planning and dairy cow diet formulation within mixed crop-livestock farming systems, considering CAP crop rotation regulations and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) environmental policies. Our approach employs a two-step framework to address enteric methane emissions. First, a multi-objective optimization generates a set of Pareto-efficient solutions, offering policymakers insights into trade-offs between economic returns and methane emissions. Second, the TAX policy (introducing a methane emissions tax) and RED policy (imposing explicit methane reduction targets) can be used to determine the required tax rates or reduction levels to achieve the selected policy goals. These policies also reveal the effects of varying tax rates and reduction levels on crop planning and diet formulation. The proposed approach is illustrated, without loss of generality, on three representative Italian dairy farms – producing milk without Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) rules (STD), or following Grana Padano (GP), or Parmigiano Reggiano (PR) PDO rules. We consider 33 types of crops, allowing double cropping, and 11 animal groups that have distinct nutritional requirements. The multi-objective optimization highlights non-linear trade-offs between economic returns and methane emissions, underscoring the critical role of policymakers in balancing these objectives. RED policy scenarios prove more effective at GHG mitigation than TAX policies. Methane mitigation initiatives prompt dietary adjustments, resulting in higher crude protein percentages and reduced neutral detergent fiber content in cow diets, consequently influencing crop plans. Moreover, under stringent GHG mitigation requirements, dairy farmers lean towards purchasing feed from the market rather than cultivating it on-farm. • A novel optimization model for crop rotation and animal diet planning is proposed. • Mixed Integer Linear Programming is used to enable crop allocation and rotation. • Alternative crop plans and diets suggested by model reduce enteric CH 4 emissions. • Non-linear trade-offs are revealed between CH 4 reduction and economic benefits. • Effective policies and tools are crucial to implement crop rotation and reduce GHG.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145636
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A mixed integer linear programming framework for mitigating enteric methane emissions on dairy farms through optimized crop and diet planning

A.S. Atzori, Yijing Gong, A. Bellingeri, F. Masoero et al.
2 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
article

A mixed integer linear programming framework for mitigating enteric methane emissions on dairy farms through optimized crop and diet planning

A.S. Atzori, Yijing Gong, A. Bellingeri, F. Masoero, Víctor E. Cabrera, Francesca Fumagalli, Antonio Gallo, G.S. Sechi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In pursuit of agricultural resilience and sustainability, the European Union (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) advocates for effective and diverse crop rotations. Yet, dairy farmers face intricate planning challenges due to diet and market complexities. This study introduces a novel mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model that optimizes both crop planning and dairy cow diet formulation within mixed crop-livestock farming systems, considering CAP crop rotation regulations and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) environmental policies. Our approach employs a two-step framework to address enteric methane emissions. First, a multi-objective optimization generates a set of Pareto-efficient solutions, offering policymakers insights into trade-offs between economic returns and methane emissions. Second, the TAX policy (introducing a methane emissions tax) and RED policy (imposing explicit methane reduction targets) can be used to determine the required tax rates or reduction levels to achieve the selected policy goals. These policies also reveal the effects of varying tax rates and reduction levels on crop planning and diet formulation. The proposed approach is illustrated, without loss of generality, on three representative Italian dairy farms – producing milk without Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) rules (STD), or following Grana Padano (GP), or Parmigiano Reggiano (PR) PDO rules. We consider 33 types of crops, allowing double cropping, and 11 animal groups that have distinct nutritional requirements. The multi-objective optimization highlights non-linear trade-offs between economic returns and methane emissions, underscoring the critical role of policymakers in balancing these objectives. RED policy scenarios prove more effective at GHG mitigation than TAX policies. Methane mitigation initiatives prompt dietary adjustments, resulting in higher crude protein percentages and reduced neutral detergent fiber content in cow diets, consequently influencing crop plans. Moreover, under stringent GHG mitigation requirements, dairy farmers lean towards purchasing feed from the market rather than cultivating it on-farm. • A novel optimization model for crop rotation and animal diet planning is proposed. • Mixed Integer Linear Programming is used to enable crop allocation and rotation. • Alternative crop plans and diets suggested by model reduce enteric CH 4 emissions. • Non-linear trade-offs are revealed between CH 4 reduction and economic benefits. • Effective policies and tools are crucial to implement crop rotation and reduce GHG.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 511
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Sassari (IT), International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (IT), University of the Sacred Heart (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.