Iraq's Strategic Significance to the United States after 2003: Interest and Decline

Objectives: The study aims to understand the strategic importance of Iraq for the United States after 2003, and to what extent Iraq still holds the same significance today as it did during the US occupation in 2003. Additionally, the study examines the possibility of the United States abandoning Iraq or remaining involved for various reasons defined by its national interests. Methods: The study employed the national interest approach as its foundation, relying on the ideas and propositions of the realist theory in international relations. Results: The study concluded that Iraq's relative strategic importance for the United States has declined due to several factors, some related to internal American issues and others to Iraq itself. Conclusions: There is a decline in Iraq's strategic importance for the United States, but the US will remain interested in playing a role there and will not completely abandon it. Therefore, what America needs today is a policy of clarity in Iraq that reduces uncertainty and removes confusion, accompanied by practical steps and a comprehensive vision for all Iraqi issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dirasat Human and Social Sciences
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v52i5.6736
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iraq's Strategic Significance to the United States after 2003: Interest and Decline

Klalid Hashem Mohammed, Zaid Khalid Saleh
Dirasat Human and Social Sciences
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Iraq's Strategic Significance to the United States after 2003: Interest and Decline

Klalid Hashem Mohammed, Zaid Khalid Saleh
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The study aims to understand the strategic importance of Iraq for the United States after 2003, and to what extent Iraq still holds the same significance today as it did during the US occupation in 2003. Additionally, the study examines the possibility of the United States abandoning Iraq or remaining involved for various reasons defined by its national interests. Methods: The study employed the national interest approach as its foundation, relying on the ideas and propositions of the realist theory in international relations. Results: The study concluded that Iraq's relative strategic importance for the United States has declined due to several factors, some related to internal American issues and others to Iraq itself. Conclusions: There is a decline in Iraq's strategic importance for the United States, but the US will remain interested in playing a role there and will not completely abandon it. Therefore, what America needs today is a policy of clarity in Iraq that reduces uncertainty and removes confusion, accompanied by practical steps and a comprehensive vision for all Iraqi issues.

Dirasat Human and Social SciencesVol. 52(5)
University of Anbar (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Iraq's Strategic Significance to the United States after 2003: Interest and Decline — Klalid Hashem Mohammed, Zaid Khalid Saleh · Dirasat Human and Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS