Quantifying AI's Role in Conflict Resolution: Assessing Its Potency in Mediation and Peacekeeping

Objectives: This research evaluates AI's efficacy in conflict resolution, focusing on mediation and peacekeeping. It comprehensively assesses AI's role through metrics, real-world applications, and comparative analysis with traditional methods, while also exploring ethical considerations, legal frameworks, and future trends. Methods: Employing a multidisciplinary approach, this study conducts a comprehensive literature review across fields like computer science, political science, and ethics. It synthesizes insights from existing research, empirical evidence, and practical experiences to understand AI's complexities in conflict resolution. Results: AI's potential in conflict resolution is vast, but ethical concerns and reliability must be addressed for sustainable peacebuilding. AI can analyze vast data, identify root causes, and suggest solutions, but biases in data and accountability concerns must be addressed to harness AI's potential fully. Conclusions: AI integration in conflict resolution requires a balanced approach considering ethical, legal, and technical aspects. Future trends suggest research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and clear guidelines for responsible use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dirasat Human and Social Sciences
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v52i5.7610
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying AI's Role in Conflict Resolution: Assessing Its Potency in Mediation and Peacekeeping

Maskuri Maskuri, Dwi Mariyono, Akmal Nur Alif Hidayatullah
Dirasat Human and Social Sciences
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Quantifying AI's Role in Conflict Resolution: Assessing Its Potency in Mediation and Peacekeeping

Maskuri Maskuri, Dwi Mariyono, Akmal Nur Alif Hidayatullah
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This research evaluates AI's efficacy in conflict resolution, focusing on mediation and peacekeeping. It comprehensively assesses AI's role through metrics, real-world applications, and comparative analysis with traditional methods, while also exploring ethical considerations, legal frameworks, and future trends. Methods: Employing a multidisciplinary approach, this study conducts a comprehensive literature review across fields like computer science, political science, and ethics. It synthesizes insights from existing research, empirical evidence, and practical experiences to understand AI's complexities in conflict resolution. Results: AI's potential in conflict resolution is vast, but ethical concerns and reliability must be addressed for sustainable peacebuilding. AI can analyze vast data, identify root causes, and suggest solutions, but biases in data and accountability concerns must be addressed to harness AI's potential fully. Conclusions: AI integration in conflict resolution requires a balanced approach considering ethical, legal, and technical aspects. Future trends suggest research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and clear guidelines for responsible use.

Dirasat Human and Social SciencesVol. 52(5)
University of Brawijaya (ID), Universitas Islam Malang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying AI's Role in Conflict Resolution: Assessing Its Potency in Mediation and Peacekeeping — Maskuri Maskuri, Dwi Mariyono, et al. · Dirasat Human and Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS