Comparative Performance Evaluation for Bidirectional 1.2–10 kV Conventional and Superjunction GaN Current Aperture Vertical Electron Transistors

Bidirectional (BD) GaN current aperture vertical electron transistors (CAVETs) featuring conventional, doped superjunction (DSJ) or polarized superjunction (PSJ) drift regions are compared at 1.2–10 kV breakdown voltages (BV). BD DSJ/PSJ devices are formed by tying two unidirectional DSJ/PSJ CAVETs in common‐source (CS) or common‐drain (CD) configuration, while the monolithic BD conventional CAVET shares a single drift region. Simulations performed using Sentaurus capture static ( R ON,sp ) and dynamic ( Q T,sp ) performance, where Q T,sp is the sum of the gate ( Q G,sp ) and drain ( Q D,sp ) charges. The figure‐of‐merit (FoM, defined as R ON,sp ⋅ Q T,sp ) quantifies each device's performance. Resistive turn‐on switching and inductive turn‐off switching are considered separately in evaluating the dynamic performance. CS and CD versions of superjunction CAVETs exhibit similar R ON,sp at all BV ratings. BD DSJ devices reduce R ON,sp by 20–97% relative to conventional BD; BD PSJ achieves a reduction of 20–99%. PSJ further decreases Q D,L,sp by 21–96% compared to DSJ by eliminating depletion effects. Overall, BD DSJ CAVETs improve FoM L by 55–75% over conventional BD; BD PSJ CAVETs add another 55–98% improvement. Under resistive turn‐on switching, CD DSJ CAVETs show a 60–98% improvement in FoM R compared to CD conventional CAVETs, with CD PSJ CAVETs yielding an additional 47–77% improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
physica status solidi (a)
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.202500055
Primary Topic
GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance Evaluation for Bidirectional 1.2–10 kV Conventional and Superjunction GaN Current Aperture Vertical Electron Transistors

Giorgian Borca‐Tasciuc, Tat‐Sing Paul Chow
physica status solidi (a)
GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
article

Comparative Performance Evaluation for Bidirectional 1.2–10 kV Conventional and Superjunction GaN Current Aperture Vertical Electron Transistors

Giorgian Borca‐Tasciuc, Tat‐Sing Paul Chow
article en

Abstract

Bidirectional (BD) GaN current aperture vertical electron transistors (CAVETs) featuring conventional, doped superjunction (DSJ) or polarized superjunction (PSJ) drift regions are compared at 1.2–10 kV breakdown voltages (BV). BD DSJ/PSJ devices are formed by tying two unidirectional DSJ/PSJ CAVETs in common‐source (CS) or common‐drain (CD) configuration, while the monolithic BD conventional CAVET shares a single drift region. Simulations performed using Sentaurus capture static ( R ON,sp ) and dynamic ( Q T,sp ) performance, where Q T,sp is the sum of the gate ( Q G,sp ) and drain ( Q D,sp ) charges. The figure‐of‐merit (FoM, defined as R ON,sp ⋅ Q T,sp ) quantifies each device's performance. Resistive turn‐on switching and inductive turn‐off switching are considered separately in evaluating the dynamic performance. CS and CD versions of superjunction CAVETs exhibit similar R ON,sp at all BV ratings. BD DSJ devices reduce R ON,sp by 20–97% relative to conventional BD; BD PSJ achieves a reduction of 20–99%. PSJ further decreases Q D,L,sp by 21–96% compared to DSJ by eliminating depletion effects. Overall, BD DSJ CAVETs improve FoM L by 55–75% over conventional BD; BD PSJ CAVETs add another 55–98% improvement. Under resistive turn‐on switching, CD DSJ CAVETs show a 60–98% improvement in FoM R compared to CD conventional CAVETs, with CD PSJ CAVETs yielding an additional 47–77% improvement.

physica status solidi (a)Vol. 222(23)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.