Evaluating YOLOv5s and YOLOv8s for Kitchen Fire Detection: A Comparative Analysis

Accurate and timely detection of kitchen fires is crucial for enhancing safety and reducing potential damage. This paper discusses comparative analysis of two cutting-edge object detection models, YOLOv5s and YOLOv8s, focusing on each performance in the critical application of kitchen fire detection. The performance of these models is evaluated using five main key metrics including precision, F1 score, recall, mean Average Precision across various thresholds (mAP50-95) and mean Average Precision at 50 percent threshold (mAP50). Results indicate that YOLOv8s significantly outperforms YOLOv5s in several metrics. YOLOv8s achieves a recall of 0.814 and an mAP50 of 0.897, compared to YOLOv5s' recall of 0.704 and mAP50 of 0.783. Additionally, YOLOv8s attains an F1 score of 0.861 and an mAP50-95 of 0.465, whereas YOLOv5s records an F1 score of 0.826 and mAP50-95 of 0.342. However, YOLOv5s shows a higher precision of 0.952 compared to YOLOv8s' 0.914. This detailed evaluation underscores YOLOv8s as a more effective model for precise fire detection in kitchen settings, highlighting its potential for enhancing real-time fire safety systems. Additionally, by offering the future work of integration of sensors with latest YOLO involvement can further optimize efficiency and fast detection rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24003/emitter.v12i2.882
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating YOLOv5s and YOLOv8s for Kitchen Fire Detection: A Comparative Analysis

Rizauddin Ramli, Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, Noor Hassim Ismail
2 citations
EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
0.73
article

Evaluating YOLOv5s and YOLOv8s for Kitchen Fire Detection: A Comparative Analysis

Rizauddin Ramli, Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, Noor Hassim Ismail
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurate and timely detection of kitchen fires is crucial for enhancing safety and reducing potential damage. This paper discusses comparative analysis of two cutting-edge object detection models, YOLOv5s and YOLOv8s, focusing on each performance in the critical application of kitchen fire detection. The performance of these models is evaluated using five main key metrics including precision, F1 score, recall, mean Average Precision across various thresholds (mAP50-95) and mean Average Precision at 50 percent threshold (mAP50). Results indicate that YOLOv8s significantly outperforms YOLOv5s in several metrics. YOLOv8s achieves a recall of 0.814 and an mAP50 of 0.897, compared to YOLOv5s' recall of 0.704 and mAP50 of 0.783. Additionally, YOLOv8s attains an F1 score of 0.861 and an mAP50-95 of 0.465, whereas YOLOv5s records an F1 score of 0.826 and mAP50-95 of 0.342. However, YOLOv5s shows a higher precision of 0.952 compared to YOLOv8s' 0.914. This detailed evaluation underscores YOLOv8s as a more effective model for precise fire detection in kitchen settings, highlighting its potential for enhancing real-time fire safety systems. Additionally, by offering the future work of integration of sensors with latest YOLO involvement can further optimize efficiency and fast detection rate.

EMITTER International Journal of Engineering TechnologyVol. 12(2)
National University of Malaysia (MY)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating YOLOv5s and YOLOv8s for Kitchen Fire Detection: A Comparative Analysis — Rizauddin Ramli, Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, et al. · EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS