Euthanasia decision making in ranches and feedlots

Beef cattle production veterinarians have a responsibility to train their clients and help them make appropriate and timely treatment, culling/railing, euthanasia and emergency sal­vage slaughter decisions. There may be times, though, that veterinarians do not agree with their client’s decision on the treatment or final disposition of a distressed or compromised animal, which will be frustrating. To be credible production animal veterinarians whom clients trust, and thus, are more likely to follow recommendations, veterinarians must under­stand beef production economics and practical, logistical reali­ties on each beef cattle operation and take these into consider­ation when providing advice. There are well documented beef industry animal health, welfare and transportation guidelines for sick and compromised cattle from the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA),14-16 Animal Health Canada,7,10 Canadi­an Cattlemen’s Association (CCA),22 U.S. (USRSB) and Canadian Roundtables of Sustainable Beef (CRSB),11,21 and Professional Animal Auditor Certification Organization (PAACO).8,20 For vet­erinarians, there are similar guidelines from the American Vet­erinary Medical Association (AVMA)5 and American Associa­tion of Bovine Practitioners (AABP).1-3 There may be additional federal or state/provincial regulations for the transport of compromised cattle that veterinarians and producers must be aware of.9 It is our responsibility as veterinarians to be famil­iar with the most current versions of these animal health and welfare guidelines and regulations, before advising our clients. Armed with current scientific, industry, and regulatory infor­mation, veterinarians can help their clients reduce the number of compromised animals in their beef cattle operations through preventive herd health programs and animal husbandry prac­tices. When that fails, veterinarians can then help their beef clients make informed, objective and timely decisions on the fi­nal disposition of their compromised cattle, which are in the best interest of the animal and the client’s financial bottom line.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21423/aabppro20259227
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Euthanasia decision making in ranches and feedlots

Joyce Van Donkersgoed
1 citations
American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
article

Euthanasia decision making in ranches and feedlots

Joyce Van Donkersgoed
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Beef cattle production veterinarians have a responsibility to train their clients and help them make appropriate and timely treatment, culling/railing, euthanasia and emergency sal­vage slaughter decisions. There may be times, though, that veterinarians do not agree with their client’s decision on the treatment or final disposition of a distressed or compromised animal, which will be frustrating. To be credible production animal veterinarians whom clients trust, and thus, are more likely to follow recommendations, veterinarians must under­stand beef production economics and practical, logistical reali­ties on each beef cattle operation and take these into consider­ation when providing advice. There are well documented beef industry animal health, welfare and transportation guidelines for sick and compromised cattle from the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA),14-16 Animal Health Canada,7,10 Canadi­an Cattlemen’s Association (CCA),22 U.S. (USRSB) and Canadian Roundtables of Sustainable Beef (CRSB),11,21 and Professional Animal Auditor Certification Organization (PAACO).8,20 For vet­erinarians, there are similar guidelines from the American Vet­erinary Medical Association (AVMA)5 and American Associa­tion of Bovine Practitioners (AABP).1-3 There may be additional federal or state/provincial regulations for the transport of compromised cattle that veterinarians and producers must be aware of.9 It is our responsibility as veterinarians to be famil­iar with the most current versions of these animal health and welfare guidelines and regulations, before advising our clients. Armed with current scientific, industry, and regulatory infor­mation, veterinarians can help their clients reduce the number of compromised animals in their beef cattle operations through preventive herd health programs and animal husbandry prac­tices. When that fails, veterinarians can then help their beef clients make informed, objective and timely decisions on the fi­nal disposition of their compromised cattle, which are in the best interest of the animal and the client’s financial bottom line.

American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings(59)
UK Coal (GB)
American Association of Bovine Practitioners
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Euthanasia decision making in ranches and feedlots — Joyce Van Donkersgoed · American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS