The Influence of Kartu Prakerja Recipients and Provincial Minimum Wage on Aggregate Employment Absorption in Indonesia During the Demographic Bonus Era

This study examines the impact of Kartu Prakerja recipients and the minimum wage (UMP) on employment absorption in Indonesia during the demographic bonus era. Using panel data regression with the Random Effect Model, secondary data from BPS, the Ministry of Manpower, and the Ministry of Home Affairs were analyzed. The results indicate that Kartu Prakerja has a positive and significant effect, while UMP has a negative but insignificant effect. Additionally, the productive-age population negatively affects employment absorption. All variables have a significant simultaneous influence. It is recommended to expand the Kartu Prakerja program, balance UMP policies with labor productivity, and prioritize job creation to effectively absorb the productive-age workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i4.142
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Kartu Prakerja Recipients and Provincial Minimum Wage on Aggregate Employment Absorption in Indonesia During the Demographic Bonus Era

Aprillia Nilasari, Rama Putri Asia
Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
article

The Influence of Kartu Prakerja Recipients and Provincial Minimum Wage on Aggregate Employment Absorption in Indonesia During the Demographic Bonus Era

Aprillia Nilasari, Rama Putri Asia
article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of Kartu Prakerja recipients and the minimum wage (UMP) on employment absorption in Indonesia during the demographic bonus era. Using panel data regression with the Random Effect Model, secondary data from BPS, the Ministry of Manpower, and the Ministry of Home Affairs were analyzed. The results indicate that Kartu Prakerja has a positive and significant effect, while UMP has a negative but insignificant effect. Additionally, the productive-age population negatively affects employment absorption. All variables have a significant simultaneous influence. It is recommended to expand the Kartu Prakerja program, balance UMP policies with labor productivity, and prioritize job creation to effectively absorb the productive-age workforce.

Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 4(4)
Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.