Automated Acetabular Defect Reconstruction and Analysis for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computational Modeling Study

Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) involving large acetabular defects is associated with high early failure rates, primarily due to cup loosening. Most acetabular defect classification systems used in surgical planning are based on planar radiographs and do not encapsulate three-dimensional geometry and morphology of the acetabular defect. This study aimed to develop an automated computational modeling pipeline for rapid generation of three-dimensional acetabular bone defect geometry. The framework employed artificial neural network segmentation of preoperative pelvic computed tomography (CT) images and statistical shape model generation for defect reconstruction in 60 rTHA patients. Regional acetabular absolute defect volumes (ADV), relative defect volumes (RDV) and defect depths (DD) were calculated and stratified within Paprosky classifications. Defect geometries from the automated modeling pipeline were validated against manually reconstructed models and were found to have a mean dice coefficient of 0.827 and a mean relative volume error of 16.4%. The mean ADV, RDV and DD of classification groups generally increased with defect severity. Except for superior RDV and ADV between 3A and 2A defects, and anterior RDV and DD between 3B and 3A defects, statistically significant differences in ADV, RDV or DD were only found between 3B and 2B-2C defects (p < 0.05). Poor correlations observed between ADV, RDV, and DD within Paprosky classifications suggest that quantitative measures are not unique to each Paprosky grade. The automated modeling tools developed may be useful in surgical planning and computational modeling of rTHA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26086
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Acetabular Defect Reconstruction and Analysis for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computational Modeling Study

Lucian B. Solomon, Peter Vee Sin Lee, Daniel Hopkins, David C. Ackland et al.
2 citations
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
4.01
article

Automated Acetabular Defect Reconstruction and Analysis for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computational Modeling Study

Lucian B. Solomon, Peter Vee Sin Lee, Daniel Hopkins, David C. Ackland, Stuart A. Callary
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) involving large acetabular defects is associated with high early failure rates, primarily due to cup loosening. Most acetabular defect classification systems used in surgical planning are based on planar radiographs and do not encapsulate three-dimensional geometry and morphology of the acetabular defect. This study aimed to develop an automated computational modeling pipeline for rapid generation of three-dimensional acetabular bone defect geometry. The framework employed artificial neural network segmentation of preoperative pelvic computed tomography (CT) images and statistical shape model generation for defect reconstruction in 60 rTHA patients. Regional acetabular absolute defect volumes (ADV), relative defect volumes (RDV) and defect depths (DD) were calculated and stratified within Paprosky classifications. Defect geometries from the automated modeling pipeline were validated against manually reconstructed models and were found to have a mean dice coefficient of 0.827 and a mean relative volume error of 16.4%. The mean ADV, RDV and DD of classification groups generally increased with defect severity. Except for superior RDV and ADV between 3A and 2A defects, and anterior RDV and DD between 3B and 3A defects, statistically significant differences in ADV, RDV or DD were only found between 3B and 2B-2C defects (p < 0.05). Poor correlations observed between ADV, RDV, and DD within Paprosky classifications suggest that quantitative measures are not unique to each Paprosky grade. The automated modeling tools developed may be useful in surgical planning and computational modeling of rTHA.

Journal of Orthopaedic Research®Vol. 43(7)
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
University of Melbourne, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.