Servant Leadership: Strengths, Weaknesses, and a Path Forward

Servant leadership, despite its popularity among academics and practitioners and consistent research findings that demonstrate its benefits for multiple stakeholders, like other leadership approaches, has not been immune to criticism. In this essay, the views of a servant leadership researcher or “insider” are presented along with the criticism of an “outsider” who has not been involved in conducting servant leadership research. The outsider identifies lack of theory development necessary to explain the mechanisms through which servant leadership affects outcomes, lack of theoretical justification of servant leadership dimensions, and measurement issues as the key problems with servant leadership research. The insider then counters these criticisms with a discussion of scale development procedures backing servant leadership measurement along with supportive empirical findings. We conclude with recommendations agreed upon by both the insider and outsider for how servant leadership theory may be enhanced and measurement improved to benefit not only academic research on servant leadership, but also its implementation in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group & Organization Management
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011251338133
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Servant Leadership: Strengths, Weaknesses, and a Path Forward

Daan van Knippenberg, Robert C. Liden
6 citations
Group & Organization Management
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
14.63
article

Servant Leadership: Strengths, Weaknesses, and a Path Forward

Daan van Knippenberg, Robert C. Liden
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Servant leadership, despite its popularity among academics and practitioners and consistent research findings that demonstrate its benefits for multiple stakeholders, like other leadership approaches, has not been immune to criticism. In this essay, the views of a servant leadership researcher or “insider” are presented along with the criticism of an “outsider” who has not been involved in conducting servant leadership research. The outsider identifies lack of theory development necessary to explain the mechanisms through which servant leadership affects outcomes, lack of theoretical justification of servant leadership dimensions, and measurement issues as the key problems with servant leadership research. The insider then counters these criticisms with a discussion of scale development procedures backing servant leadership measurement along with supportive empirical findings. We conclude with recommendations agreed upon by both the insider and outsider for how servant leadership theory may be enhanced and measurement improved to benefit not only academic research on servant leadership, but also its implementation in practice.

Group & Organization Management
University of Leeds (GB), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
14.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.