Impact of Explanation Techniques and Representations on Users' Comprehension and Confidence in Explainable AI

Local explainability, an important sub-field of eXplainable AI, focuses on describing the decisions of AI models for individual use cases by providing the underlying relationships between a model's inputs and outputs. While the machine learning community has made substantial progress in improving explanation accuracy and completeness, these explanations are rarely evaluated by the final users. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of various explanation and representation techniques on users' comprehension and confidence. Through a user study on two different domains, we assessed three commonly used local explanation techniques—feature-attribution, rule-based, and counterfactual—and explored how their visual representation—graphical or text-based—influences users' comprehension and trust. Our results show that the choice of explanation technique primarily affects user comprehension, whereas the graphical representation impacts user confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3711011
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Explanation Techniques and Representations on Users' Comprehension and Confidence in Explainable AI

Niels van Berkel, Christine Largouët, J. Delaunay, Luis Galárraga
3 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
7.44
article

Impact of Explanation Techniques and Representations on Users' Comprehension and Confidence in Explainable AI

Niels van Berkel, Christine Largouët, J. Delaunay, Luis Galárraga
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Local explainability, an important sub-field of eXplainable AI, focuses on describing the decisions of AI models for individual use cases by providing the underlying relationships between a model's inputs and outputs. While the machine learning community has made substantial progress in improving explanation accuracy and completeness, these explanations are rarely evaluated by the final users. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of various explanation and representation techniques on users' comprehension and confidence. Through a user study on two different domains, we assessed three commonly used local explanation techniques—feature-attribution, rule-based, and counterfactual—and explored how their visual representation—graphical or text-based—influences users' comprehension and trust. Our results show that the choice of explanation technique primarily affects user comprehension, whereas the graphical representation impacts user confidence.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(2)
Institut Agro Rennes-Angers (FR), Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires (FR), L'Institut Agro (FR), Aalborg University (DK)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.