Human-Centered Team Training for Human-AI Teams: From Training with AI Tools to Training for AI Teammates

AI increasingly assumes complex roles in Human-AI Teaming (HAT). However, communication and trust issues between humans and AI often hinder effective collaboration within HATs, highlighting a need for effective human-centered team training, an area significantly understudied. To address this gap, we interviewed eSports athletes and team-based, competitive gamers (N=22), a group experienced in HATs and team training, about their HAT team training needs and desires. Through the lens of Quantitative Ethnography (QE), we analyzed their insights to understand preferred team training strategies and the desired roles of AI within these strategies, considering the varying levels of human expertise. Our findings reveal a strong preference across all expertise levels for cross-training, which is training in other teammate roles, to improve perspective taking and coordination in HATs. Less experienced participants prefer structured procedural training, while experts favor self-correction methods for growth. Additionally, participants desired that AI act as a companion, with beginners and intermediates valuing AI's functional roles, and experts seeking AI in a coaching role. Among the first to emphasize human-centered team training in HATs, this study contributes to CSCW/HCI research by revealing varied preferences for training and AI roles, emphasizing the need to tailor these aspects to team dynamics and individual skills for better outcomes in HATs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3710998
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-Centered Team Training for Human-AI Teams: From Training with AI Tools to Training for AI Teammates

Nathan J. McNeese, Wen Duan, Rohit Mallick, Caitlin Lancaster
3 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Big Data and Business Intelligence
6.85
article

Human-Centered Team Training for Human-AI Teams: From Training with AI Tools to Training for AI Teammates

Nathan J. McNeese, Wen Duan, Rohit Mallick, Caitlin Lancaster
article en
3 citations

Abstract

AI increasingly assumes complex roles in Human-AI Teaming (HAT). However, communication and trust issues between humans and AI often hinder effective collaboration within HATs, highlighting a need for effective human-centered team training, an area significantly understudied. To address this gap, we interviewed eSports athletes and team-based, competitive gamers (N=22), a group experienced in HATs and team training, about their HAT team training needs and desires. Through the lens of Quantitative Ethnography (QE), we analyzed their insights to understand preferred team training strategies and the desired roles of AI within these strategies, considering the varying levels of human expertise. Our findings reveal a strong preference across all expertise levels for cross-training, which is training in other teammate roles, to improve perspective taking and coordination in HATs. Less experienced participants prefer structured procedural training, while experts favor self-correction methods for growth. Additionally, participants desired that AI act as a companion, with beginners and intermediates valuing AI's functional roles, and experts seeking AI in a coaching role. Among the first to emphasize human-centered team training in HATs, this study contributes to CSCW/HCI research by revealing varied preferences for training and AI roles, emphasizing the need to tailor these aspects to team dynamics and individual skills for better outcomes in HATs.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(2)
Sandia National Laboratories (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
6.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.