Gender differences in subjective wellbeing in Japan: An intersectionality approach

• Analyzed gender differences in wellbeing across diverse demographic groups. • Employed a multidimensional measure of wellbeing to capture its complexity. • Found that women generally reported higher wellbeing scores than men. • No wellbeing gender gap found for teens, young adults, and single parents. Studies on gender differences in wellbeing often use narrowly defined wellbeing measures and only focus on overall comparison of men and women. This study examined gender differences in diverse wellbeing metrics across various subgroups. Data were obtained from the Nikkei Gross Domestic Wellbeing Survey—a quarterly survey on wellbeing among a nationally representative sample of people in Japan who are ≥15 years old (from 2021 to 2023; n = 9,080). Our wellbeing outcomes included life satisfaction, happiness, the human flourishing domains, balance and harmony, calmness, and interdependent happiness. Gender differences in mean wellbeing scores (men minus women) were computed in the overall sample and within each demographic subgroup, including age groups, household income levels, educational attainment, employment status, family structure, and residency. Overall, women scored higher in wellbeing metrics than men (e.g., the gap in mean life satisfaction: 0.55, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.47 to 0.64). This trend persisted across most subgroups, but there were no significant gender differences among teenagers (e.g., life satisfaction: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.53 to 0.32; composite flourishing score: -0.35, 95% CI: -2.14 to 1.42), individuals in their twenties (e.g., life satisfaction: 0.16, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.41; composite flourishing score: 0.07, 95% CI: -0.97 to 1.11), and unmarried individuals with children (life satisfaction: -0.20, 95% CI: -0.84 to 0.45; composite flourishing score: -0.87, 95% CI: -3.46 to 1.72). While women generally reported higher wellbeing, certain subgroups exhibited unique patterns. Understanding these dynamics can inform targeted interventions to promote equity in wellbeing across demographic groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellbeing Space and Society
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2025.100270
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender differences in subjective wellbeing in Japan: An intersectionality approach

Azuna Sawada, Kanami Tsuno, Koichiro Shiba
Wellbeing Space and Society
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Gender differences in subjective wellbeing in Japan: An intersectionality approach

Azuna Sawada, Kanami Tsuno, Koichiro Shiba
article en

Abstract

• Analyzed gender differences in wellbeing across diverse demographic groups. • Employed a multidimensional measure of wellbeing to capture its complexity. • Found that women generally reported higher wellbeing scores than men. • No wellbeing gender gap found for teens, young adults, and single parents. Studies on gender differences in wellbeing often use narrowly defined wellbeing measures and only focus on overall comparison of men and women. This study examined gender differences in diverse wellbeing metrics across various subgroups. Data were obtained from the Nikkei Gross Domestic Wellbeing Survey—a quarterly survey on wellbeing among a nationally representative sample of people in Japan who are ≥15 years old (from 2021 to 2023; n = 9,080). Our wellbeing outcomes included life satisfaction, happiness, the human flourishing domains, balance and harmony, calmness, and interdependent happiness. Gender differences in mean wellbeing scores (men minus women) were computed in the overall sample and within each demographic subgroup, including age groups, household income levels, educational attainment, employment status, family structure, and residency. Overall, women scored higher in wellbeing metrics than men (e.g., the gap in mean life satisfaction: 0.55, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.47 to 0.64). This trend persisted across most subgroups, but there were no significant gender differences among teenagers (e.g., life satisfaction: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.53 to 0.32; composite flourishing score: -0.35, 95% CI: -2.14 to 1.42), individuals in their twenties (e.g., life satisfaction: 0.16, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.41; composite flourishing score: 0.07, 95% CI: -0.97 to 1.11), and unmarried individuals with children (life satisfaction: -0.20, 95% CI: -0.84 to 0.45; composite flourishing score: -0.87, 95% CI: -3.46 to 1.72). While women generally reported higher wellbeing, certain subgroups exhibited unique patterns. Understanding these dynamics can inform targeted interventions to promote equity in wellbeing across demographic groups.

Wellbeing Space and SocietyVol. 8
Boston University (US), Kanagawa University of Human Services (JP), Columbia University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.