Human oversight and risk-based approach to artificial intelligence: What does the Artificial Intelligence Act have in common with discussions about lethal autonomous weapon systems?

The regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) is a pressing global concern, with various regulatory bodies aiming to foster innovation while safeguarding humanity’s interests. This article synthesises perspectives on AI regulation in civilian and military domains, highlighting common ethical foundations and legal proposals. Emphasising the European Union’s ethical community as delineated by fundamental rights, it explores the Artificial Intelligence Act and debates on lethal autonomous weapon systems within the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. By analysing the overlap between civilian and military ethics, the article argues for a shared objective: promoting innovation while upholding human dignity through robust regulations that ensure human oversight and a risk-based approach. The article contends that the consensus on substantive issues regarding military AI regulation is imminent, but its formalisation through legal means may lag behind.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Integration Studies
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46941/2024.2.8
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human oversight and risk-based approach to artificial intelligence: What does the Artificial Intelligence Act have in common with discussions about lethal autonomous weapon systems?

Kaja Kowalczewska
European Integration Studies
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Human oversight and risk-based approach to artificial intelligence: What does the Artificial Intelligence Act have in common with discussions about lethal autonomous weapon systems?

Kaja Kowalczewska
article en

Abstract

The regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) is a pressing global concern, with various regulatory bodies aiming to foster innovation while safeguarding humanity’s interests. This article synthesises perspectives on AI regulation in civilian and military domains, highlighting common ethical foundations and legal proposals. Emphasising the European Union’s ethical community as delineated by fundamental rights, it explores the Artificial Intelligence Act and debates on lethal autonomous weapon systems within the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. By analysing the overlap between civilian and military ethics, the article argues for a shared objective: promoting innovation while upholding human dignity through robust regulations that ensure human oversight and a risk-based approach. The article contends that the consensus on substantive issues regarding military AI regulation is imminent, but its formalisation through legal means may lag behind.

European Integration StudiesVol. 20(2)
Department of Administration (GU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.